Yeagermeister
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,629
- Reaction score
- 117
Juke99;1976769 said:Thank you. Goodness knows I've tried to keep the two of 'em in control. :bang2:
And it hasn't worked yet :tongue:
Juke99;1976769 said:Thank you. Goodness knows I've tried to keep the two of 'em in control. :bang2:
WoodysGirl;1976784 said:FITZGERALD TRADE UNLIKELY
Posted by Mike Florio on February 29, 2008, 9:00 a.m.
As the growing PFT Planet chapter in Philly watches and waits for the Eagles to inject some new talent into the roster, one of the lingering fantasies is that the team will swing a trade for Cardinals receiver Larry Fitzgerald.
We don’t see it happening, for two reasons.
First, Fitzgerald is due to earn total base salaries of $31 million over the next two seasons under the ridiculously stoopid contract that the Cardinals gave him as a rookie. Whoever trades for Fitzgerald has to assume that contract. And, surely, his new team would want to extend the deal.
But any new contract would have to have guaranteed money that matches the amounts he’s due to earn over the next two years. And it would probably take a lot more than that to get Fitz to give up an essentially “guaranteed” $31 million over the next two seasons and a shot at unrestricted free agency in what very well could be an uncapped year.
Second, the Cardinals have to want to trade him. Though it might be in their best interests to do so, it wasn’t in their best interests to give him that contract in the first place. So don’t count on this franchise doing anything that reasonable people would regard as smart.
Our guess is that Fitzgerald will spend the next two seasons with the Cardinals, pocket his $31 million, and go elsewhere in March 2010 — especially since the franchise tender for Fitzgerald in 2010 would exceed $20 million.
Meanwhile, the Cardinals now claim that their ability to sign new free agents and keep their own free agents is hampered by the Fitzgerald situation.
Hey, guys — you only have yourselves to blame. And if you don’t want to pay Fitzgerald what you previously agreed to pay him, you have an option.
You can cut him.
Unlikely doesn't mean impossible.WoodysGirl;1976784 said:FITZGERALD TRADE UNLIKELY
HardHittingRoy31;1976802 said:Just saw this and was going to post it. wip610 said if they don't get Fitz, Walker will be next.
WoodysGirl;1976784 said:Our guess is that Fitzgerald will spend the next two seasons with the Cardinals, pocket his $31 million, and go elsewhere in March 2010 — especially since the franchise tender for Fitzgerald in 2010 would exceed $20 million.
Yeagermeister;1976811 said:I'd rather they get Walker instead of Fitz any day.
WoodysGirl;1976784 said:FITZGERALD TRADE UNLIKELY
Posted by Mike Florio on February 29, 2008, 9:00 a.m.
As the growing PFT Planet chapter in Philly watches and waits for the Eagles to inject some new talent into the roster, one of the lingering fantasies is that the team will swing a trade for Cardinals receiver Larry Fitzgerald.
We don’t see it happening, for two reasons.
First, Fitzgerald is due to earn total base salaries of $31 million over the next two seasons under the ridiculously stoopid contract that the Cardinals gave him as a rookie. Whoever trades for Fitzgerald has to assume that contract. And, surely, his new team would want to extend the deal.
But any new contract would have to have guaranteed money that matches the amounts he’s due to earn over the next two years. And it would probably take a lot more than that to get Fitz to give up an essentially “guaranteed” $31 million over the next two seasons and a shot at unrestricted free agency in what very well could be an uncapped year.
Second, the Cardinals have to want to trade him. Though it might be in their best interests to do so, it wasn’t in their best interests to give him that contract in the first place. So don’t count on this franchise doing anything that reasonable people would regard as smart.
Our guess is that Fitzgerald will spend the next two seasons with the Cardinals, pocket his $31 million, and go elsewhere in March 2010 — especially since the franchise tender for Fitzgerald in 2010 would exceed $20 million.
Meanwhile, the Cardinals now claim that their ability to sign new free agents and keep their own free agents is hampered by the Fitzgerald situation.
Hey, guys — you only have yourselves to blame. And if you don’t want to pay Fitzgerald what you previously agreed to pay him, you have an option.
You can cut him.
AmishCowboy;1976871 said:He was on the WIP morning show this Morning and said this, much to the dismay of the Eagle Fans.
HardHittingRoy31;1976705 said:I live 10 minutes outside Philly and listen to WIP610 and their reporter Gary Cobb said Philly is trying very hard to land Fitzgerald from the Cards. They are reporting that they may deal Lito Sheppard and their #19th pick in this years draft and possible more.
I'll try to keep you guys updated.
If that happens, the Cowboys better do something in response!
Yeagermeister;1976726 said:Three words....40 yard slant
To make matters worse, it was also the wrong route. It's the 30-yd slant. Duh!HeavyHitta31;1977027 said:This hurts
Not that you said it, but that you didnt have the decency to say it to the right guy :
WoodysGirl;1977034 said:To make matters worse, it was also the wrong route. It's the 30-yd slant. Duh!