I only have a couple of comments so I won't be very long.
Easy NFC-East in 2000 - 2004; Eagles window closes in 2004 after Superbowl loss to the Pats ...2005 an improved NFC-East slams the window shut; injuries not a factor!
2006 NFC-East is the Beast; Eagles purportedly have easy opening schdule but will (choke/fizzle out) be inconsistent due to the difficult 2nd part of the schedule.
Are you serious!? Even if I weren't an Eagles fan I'd be suspicious of those perspectives. First of all, there is no such thing as an "esasy" schedule! There are some schedules that are more difficult than others, but you know that anything can happen on any given Sunday ...upsets are alive and doing well! Coaches these days are not going to prepare any less under the assumption that one team is "easier" to beat than another.
Secondly, this so-called "difficult" teams during the 2nd half of our schedule Is just as rediculous. Remember, those difficult teams have played difficult teams during the 1st half of the schedule. That said, I do Not classify the Eagles as an "easy" team. If you fool yourself into believing that, I only hope Bill Parcells does the same when we meet you (BTW ...don't you guys have an unusually early BYE-Week? How do you think that will impact your team?)
Final point ...the Eagles (and fans) are coming off of a tumultuous 2005 season. Whether you believe that injuries were a factor or not, is irrelevant. Because the Eagle players have been quoted in saying that they have something to prove this year; especially in the NFC-East. Now that doesn't necessarily strike fear in the hearts of anyone, but the statement there is that the Eagles have improved since 2005. Those difficult teams had better be prepared to ply difficult games if they expect to compete with the Eagles in 2006!
Bank on it!