Pic of Henry getting pulled down by facemask?

aikemirv said:
That was not a jam - it was in the endzone when the pass was let go!

Go look at the tape!

still wasnt past 5 yards...so he still had the right to put his hands on him..n when the pass was let go...reggie grabbed him..all he was tryna d was keep his balance while stumbling..because of that goofy *** reciver williams

he tried to do the same thing to newman in the endzone..newman wasnt having it
 
abersonc said:
Get over it. What are they going to do? Change the call retrospectively? Every season you take some bad ones and you get about the same number of bad ones go your way.

not the cowboys.
 
Terence Newman700 said:
still wasnt past 5 yards...so he still had the right to put his hands on him..

The line of scrimmage was back at the 6. Reggie and Henry were well into the endzone when contact was first initiated.
 
Smashmouth24 said:
The line of scrimmage was back at the 6. Reggie and Henry were well into the endzone when contact was first initiated.


ahhh watever..reggie is still a big Goofie reciever...goofy *** had to pull on henry
 
Smashmouth24 said:
The line of scrimmage was back at the 6. Reggie and Henry were well into the endzone when contact was first initiated.

Thanks, I did not have the energy to argue!
 
I mentioned last season that it seems everytime Troy Aikman broadcast Cowboy games they end up losing the game. Aikman jinx?

Boyzmamacita said:
Troy thinks anything against Dallas is a good call. I love me some Troy, but he SHOULD NOT broadcast any more Cowboys game.
 
icyhot said:
I mentioned last season that it seems everytime Troy Aikman broadcast Cowboy games they end up losing the game. Aikman jinx?

Wasn't he broadcasting last year's Panthers game?
 
InmanRoshi said:
Yeah, its called a jam .. its pretty common practice among cornerbacks.

A jam doesn't apply in the end zone - or even beyond a certain distance past the line of scrimmage (5 yards isn't it?). In those instances the "jam" is actually pass interference.
 
Not sure if so that debunks my theory but more often than not we do lose that I have noticed.

DragonCowboy said:
Wasn't he broadcasting last year's Panthers game?
 
icyhot said:
Not sure if so that debunks my theory but more often than not we do lose that I have noticed.

Hmm..I actually didn't watch the game, I was in San Francisco, and they were playing the San Fran Arizona game.

Although, I did remember many people on here were yelling, "Shut Up Troy" after Steve Smith got ejected.
 
Doomsday101 said:
Henry was not in good position on that play. I felt it was a good no call then and still feel the same today about it.

he was in a bad position he wasn't even looking for the ball
 
Terence Newman700 said:
lol wat did gibbs do

He blamed about 3 or 4 losses last year on the refs and sent tapes in to the league office to be reviewed by the NFL.
 
The receiver definitely pushed/threw Henry down and it was a bad non-call. It doesn't matter now though because the game is over and there is nothing to do about it so why not let it go.
 
It was a bad call. But then, Flo got away with what appeared to me to be an obvious hold once or twice during the game.

We played poorly and lost. It's not the refs' fault.
 
Tennione72 said:
he was in a bad position he wasn't even looking for the ball

It's not an easy play - the second he turns to the ball might be the moment the ball passes by. The player can only look for the ball if he is sure he has time to turn, see it and make a play - otherwise he has to just keep an eye on the receiver and read his eyes and actions and hope to break up the catch.
 
dmq said:
Troy thought it was a good no call. Just like he thought the Witten Offensive PI was a good call.

Very quickly getting sick of Troy. He gets more anti Cowboys every year IMHO.
 
THUMPER said:
The receiver definitely pushed/threw Henry down and it was a bad non-call. It doesn't matter now though because the game is over and there is nothing to do about it so why not let it go.

It's funny how everyone completely ignores that Henry was all over the receiver before the receiver interfered with Henry.

There is no doubt that Henry was interfered with, but Henry could just as easily been called for interference himself.

In other words, bad officiating all the way around - not just one-sided.
 
Stautner said:
It's funny how everyone completely ignores that Henry was all over the receiver before the receiver interfered with Henry.

There is no doubt that Henry was interfered with, but Henry could just as easily been called for interference himself.

In other words, bad officiating all the way around - not just one-sided.

some folks would say good officiating -- they were shoving and fighting the entire way - they fouled each other -- you can call a penalty on both guys but that nullifies the play. You don't call a penalty and you get a fair result.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,278
Messages
13,862,997
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top