Please Help Me!

[RedRaiderCowboysFan]

What would it matter, any qb under the age of 35 would be successful with this team. Brad Johnson was a very good qb in his prime, if he was 10 years younger the Cowboys would have a better chance to win a Super Bowl with him.

And before anybody wants to say that he had a great team around him, thats why Tampa won, then you must admit romo has an even better team around him. Yes Tampa had a great defense that year, but no TO, Witten or 3 pro bowl offensive lineman. Johnson might not have put up big numbers, he just performed in the clutch and showed the pressure wasnt to much for him.

 

[sago1]

Yes, but how many years had Johnson been a starting QB before he finally was able to win the SB.

 

[Hoofbite]

An asteroid caused the extinction of the dinosaurs and, inevitably, will do the same for man.

It's only a question of when?

Thats where you are wrong my friend because humans have a couple of things that the dinosaurs didn't.

Namely,

Ben Affleck
Bruce Willis
Steve Buscemi


As far as the QB situation goes, if there really were football gods at work here, they would have been doing Dallas a favor to strike down one of those starting QBs from a few years ago.

Oh, and by the way. Peyton Manning, Tom Brady and Brett Favre called. They all said that they fart in face of, and laugh at, the thought of odds taking them down for any extended period of time.

 

[theogt]

The odds of a QB being injured are only significant if you look at the time period as a whole. If you were to go back to 2003 and say that we wouldnt miss more than 2 quarters then that would be highly improbable.

All of that has come to pass and in terms of future probabilities it is immaterial. The fact that Romo has not missed time also bodes well. There is statistical evidence that players thatdon't miss time the previous year are more likely to not miss time the following year. In that context it actually is a good thing that Romo has not missed time.

Not trying to get into it, but this is a silly stat. Compared to what? Players that were injured in the previous year? Of course players that were injured would on average miss more time than players that weren't injured in the previous season. The stat doesn't tell you anything worthwhile.