Poll: Cowboys America's most hated team

[Jimz31]

I just chalk it up to Jealousy.....such an ugly trait.

 

[DallasEast]

No, a number one seed is not relevant when it is quickly squandered.

By your logic, the #4 Buccaneers, #2 Packers and #1 Cowboys and #1 Patriots were all non-relevant seeds in 2007 since the fifth seeded Giants beat all of them to win the Super Bowl. Now, that's an arrogant conversational position to take.

 

[Stash]

No, a number one seed is not relevant when it is quickly squandered.

Much like a team not winning a Super Bowl in over 17 years? With just 6 winning seasons since?

A Commanders fan shouldn't be making comments about 'relevance'.

And I noticed you didn't answer my prior question regarding your perceived arrogance.

Selective responses?

 

[Texan_Eph89]

People hate others people's success.
I'm glad we're the most hated team, it reflects the acomplishments of the organization.

 

[jazzcat22]

We are the most hated team....just as we are the most loved team also....

 

[tchoice23]

No, a number one seed is not relevant when it is quickly squandered.

You belong to the cult of Colt, right?

 

[Ren]

We need to get back to winning i'm not happy just edging out NE, we should have at least 75% of the votes :bang2:

 

[big dog cowboy]

I've said for decades that we were the most popular and most hated team on the planet. I LOVE IT!!!

 

[Sammy Baugh]

By your logic, the #4 Buccaneers, #2 Packers and #1 Cowboys and #1 Patriots were all non-relevant seeds in 2007 since the fifth seeded Giants beat all of them to win the Super Bowl. Now, that's an arrogant conversational position to take.

Not arrogant, just a simple fact. None of those teams played on Super Bowl Sunday, so whether they were seeded #6 or #1 was irrelevant. A number 6 seed loser goes home the same way as a number one seed loser, do they not?

 

[Sammy Baugh]

You belong to the cult of Colt, right?

Nope, definitely not. To have Colt start would be a disaster.

 

[Sammy Baugh]

Much like a team not winning a Super Bowl in over 17 years? With just 6 winning seasons since?

A Commanders fan shouldn't be making comments about 'relevance'.

And I noticed you didn't answer my prior question regarding your perceived arrogance.

Selective responses?

I didn't answer because someone else did for me quite well.

 

[Stash]

I didn't answer because someone else did for me quite well.

More like because you're in over your head.

 

[Sammy Baugh]

More like because you're in over your head.

I'm not in over my head, you just seem to have trouble reading. So let's repeat what another poster said:

"Not having won a playoff game in 11 years, but continually throwing yourself into a conversation of CURRENT relevant teams."

Aren't you happy that that was repeated?

 

[Stash]

I'm not in over my head, you just seem to have trouble reading. So let's repeat what another poster said:

"Not having won a playoff game in 11 years, but continually throwing yourself into a conversation of CURRENT relevant teams."

Aren't you happy that that was repeated?

Do you always let someone else think for you?

I didn't get my question answered the first time.

What conversation?

Where?

Here?

What would you expect?

And besides, why wouldn't a team that was 13-3 two seasons ago be relevant?

I thought it was a poor excuse then and I do now.

Your team has been mediocre for almost 20 years, how can you judge relevance anyway?

 

[Sammy Baugh]

Do you always let someone else think for you?

I didn't get my question answered the first time.

What conversation?

Where?

Here?

What would you expect?

And besides, why wouldn't a team that was 13-3 two seasons ago be relevant?

I thought it was a poor excuse then and I do now.

Your team has been mediocre for almost 20 years, how can you judge relevance anyway?

No, I don't let others think for me. I also don't needlessly repeat things.

As for your next four questions, they have already been answered, I am not going to needlessly repeat things when you could just READ.

A team that was 13-3 in 2007 starts out at 0-0 in 2009. Performance two years ago is not relevant to today. And even if I do grant relevance, that is not a reason for arrogance, which was the beginning point of this conversation, especially when that 13-3 team was one and done in the playoffs.

Your last question is just foolish. It is manifestly clear that the Commanders performance on the field bears no relation to my personal ability to think and judge clearly.

 

[DallasEast]

Not arrogant, just a simple fact. None of those teams played on Super Bowl Sunday, so whether they were seeded #6 or #1 was irrelevant. A number 6 seed loser goes home the same way as a number one seed loser, do they not?

It'll finally dawn on you. I have faith in you. Really.

The hell I do.

 

[Stash]

No, I don't let others think for me. I also don't needlessly repeat things.

It sure looked like it when you 'let' someone else answer for you, then quoted it.

As for your next four questions, they have already been answered, I am not going to needlessly repeat things when you could just READ.

No, they weren't. They weren't then and they aren't now.

But I get it, the Cowboys are 'arrogant' because 'they just are, that's all'. It's the answer I expected quite frankly.

A team that was 13-3 in 2007 starts out at 0-0 in 2009. Performance two years ago is not relevant to today. And even if I do grant relevance, that is not a reason for arrogance, which was the beginning point of this conversation, especially when that 13-3 team was one and done in the playoffs.

So now your reasoning is that - since everyone starts 2009 at 0-0, nobody can mention themselves as a playoff or 'relevant' team.

Gotcha.

Keep dancing.

Your last question is just foolish. It is manifestly clear that the Commanders performance on the field bears no relation to my personal ability to think and judge clearly.

But it has everything to do with relevance, or the lack thereof.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

Your last question is just foolish. It is manifestly clear that the Commanders performance on the field bears no relation to my personal ability to think and judge clearly.

If you had the ability to judge things clearly, you wouldn't be a Commanders fan.:laugh2:

 

[Hyperion]

I would be curious to see how the question was worded. I find the current cast of characters on the Patriots to be far easier to hate than anyone on the Cowboys. Honestly outside of NFC East fans, I can't see how any football fan could see it differently.

However if you're just talking about the organization as a whole then Dallas will always be near the top regardless of the level of their success on the field just like the Lakers and Yankees.

 

[LowTech]

I will bathe in the hatred.



:starspin