Possible WR help??? Peter Warrick possible release?

DasTex

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,423
Reaction score
4,515
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Warrick faced with pay cut or being cutBy Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com


Unless he agrees to a pay cut, one that reduces his 2005 salary cap number and his scheduled base salary of $2.2 million for this season, Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Peter Warrick could be cut by the team.


2004 SEASON STATISTICS
Rec Yds TD Avg Long YAC
11 127 0 11.5 30 75


Warrick, who has not practiced in training camp as he continued his rehabilitation from a leg injury that limited him to four games in 2004, visited with Dr. James Andrews, the renowned Birmingham, Ala.-based orthopedics specialist earlier this week and was told he could return to the field. But the Bengals, wary of the injury and suddenly deeper at wide receiver than in recent years, might not clear Warrick to practice unless he agrees to rework his contract.

The decision for Warrick could come down to acquiescing to the Bengals wishes or being released and hoping there is interest in him as a free agent. It is also possible Cincinnati might trade Warrick if any potential suitors stepped forward.

The fourth overall selection in the 2000 draft, Warrick enjoyed a career season in 2003, with 79 receptions for 819 yards and seven touchdowns while working principally out of the slot. But the leg injury scuttled his '04 campaign and the former Florida State star had only 11 catches for 127 yards in four appearances.

Cincinnati coaches have privately questioned Warrick's diligence in rehabilitation and indicated in training camp that they were prepared to play without him. Even Warrick said this week that he did not "know my role in Cincinnati [anymore]."

Certainly the wide receiver landscape has changed in Cincinnati, where the Bengals have become young, talented and deep at the position. T.J. Houshmandzadeh, who replaced Warrick as the starter opposite Pro Bowl performer Chad Johnson in 2004, is coming off a career year and this spring signed a new four-year contract to stay with the club.

In what is a make-or-break season for third-year pro Kelley Washington, the former Tennessee standout is having a solid camp. And the coaches are high on rookie Chris Henry, a third-round choice from West Virginia.

Coach Marvin Lewis said two weeks ago in camp that the team "has moved on" in regard to Warrick, meaning the coaches were preparing as if he would not be available. "Once we did that last season," Lewis said, "we became a better team."


Warrick has appeared in 66 games, and started 55, in five seasons. He has 264 receptions for 2,811 yards and 18 touchdowns.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. To check out Len's chat archive, click here .
 
Messages
726
Reaction score
10
i really like crayton pushing for this number 3. i see him only moving up!

there's no rule saying you have to be a number 1 pick to be a great receiver.
 

KDWilliams85

New Member
Messages
713
Reaction score
0
Peter Warrick is a viable option. We'd have to use a lot of 5WR sets if we managed to pick Warrick up but we'd definitely have a killer passing game. Crayton and Morgan are duking it out and it wouldn't kill us to throw a 3rd guy into the mix.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,145
Reaction score
3,864
If it weren't for the injury, then I'd be all for it. I think BP and JJ will be wary of the injury as well.

I think Warrick would be a great pick up as a punt returner if nothing else.
 

AmishCowboy

if you ain't first, you're last
Messages
5,134
Reaction score
569
If he's released would he find his way to Philly?. The Beagles only have Greg Lewis, Billy McMillian and the Rookie WR Brown. Maybe he fits in Big D, I'll have to think about it. :trophy: :iggles: :suxiggle: :disseags:
 

TheHustler

Active Member
Messages
5,392
Reaction score
1
Peter Warrick is the type of talent on a bad team that could use a change of scenery.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
The Bengals seem to be coming around though, they have a good QB, decent run game. And when he doesn't have to be the only threat, he should be a very productive WR.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Warrick= huge bust

I'd rather go with Crayton as the 3rd WR, at least he has upside

David
 
Messages
138
Reaction score
5
Who would trade Quincy Morgan for Peter Warrick? I think I might. I doubt they would want a receiver in excahnge for Warrick, but I think Morgan should be the new Coakley of trade scenarios.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
I don't see Warrick in Dallas but if the opportunity were there, I'd bring Warrick in without hesitation. He fits what we need in our offense, IMO.
 

Qwickdraw

Benched
Messages
5,451
Reaction score
0
I like Warrick and think he is a vastly underrated WR.
I'd be all about having him in Dallas but his injury has been dragging on for a long time now and that is probably why Cincy ultimately is letting him go.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,398
Reaction score
96,095
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Qwickdraw said:
I like Warrick and think he is a vastly underrated WR.
I'd be all about having him in Dallas but his injury has been dragging on for a long time now and that is probably why Cincy ultimately is letting him go.

I agree. He did not have an offense or QB in Cincy his first several years. Also, didn't he miss his year with a knee ligamnet injury, after a holdout? Seems vaguely familiar, or it was another WR, top pick out of NCAA.

However, I would be all for him coming here at the right price (what a cliche that has become with the salary cap). and as long as he didn't push a young WR prospect off the roster (Crayton, Copper, or maybe Merritt)
 

Dayton Cowboy

Active Member
Messages
1,862
Reaction score
5
Here are Warrick's stats...

RECEIVING

Year Team G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2000 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 51 592 11.6 46 4 7 1 33
2001 Cincinnati Bengals 16 14 70 667 9.5 33 1 8 0 34
2002 Cincinnati Bengals 15 10 53 606 11.4 37 6 9 0 26
2003 Cincinnati Bengals 15 14 79 819 10.4 77 7 8 1 48
2004 Cincinnati Bengals 4 1 11 127 11.5 30 0 2 0 6
TOTAL 66 55 264 2811 10.6 77 18 34 2 147

PUNT RETURNS

Year Team G No FC Yards Avg Lg TD 20+
2000 Cincinnati Bengals 16 7 1 123 17.6 82 1 1
2001 Cincinnati Bengals 16 18 10 116 6.4 31 0 1
2002 Cincinnati Bengals 15 4 0 14 3.5 10 0 0
2003 Cincinnati Bengals 15 25 8 273 10.9 68 1 4
2004 Cincinnati Bengals 4 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
TOTAL 66 54 19 526 9.7 82 2 6



Living close to Bungal land.... I remember a lot of their fans calling him a bust until a couple of years ago... For all the great games he has, he also has quite a few that he just disappears in..

Would I want him at the right price? Yes.. Also he's decent punt returner.. He's a threat to take it all the way, He just rarely seems to do that
 

HardHittin'Witten

This ain't Madden
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
2,951
great player at Free Shoes U. bust in the NFL. He could maybe just need a change of scenery, but I doubt it.
 

Compacity

Benched
Messages
656
Reaction score
0
I think that if the Cowboys know how to play him in the system he will be good...
 
Top