Post game thoughts

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
silverbear said:
I sure do wish I had a dollar for every time somebody told me that... my response is always the same, if you know how to read a stats sheet, if you UNDERSTAND the stats, they DO tell you what happened in a game...

They can show you that we surrendered no sacks. How exactly can you see pressures from the stat sheet? By reading that, you would think Bledsoe left with a clean jersey and wasn't touched. Both he and Romo were running for their lives.

Sorry, but the stats do not tell you the entire story. No amount of "understanding" can change that in regards to drawing certain conclusions. They don't include QB pressures, dropped passes, missed blocks and so on.
 

TNCowboy

Double Trouble
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
3,209
I really wonder if a lot of fans have the slightest clue about what they're really seeing when they're watching a game.

Minnesota consistently played 8 (and more) in the box. NO did the same. Rivera and Gurode had some terrible plays, but most of the stifling run defense was because they simply had more guys than we could block. I think Parcells wanted to put this OL under as much duress as he could. The playcalling and the protection didn't adjust, I believe for that very reason. That may be why in his post game comments, Parcells seemed much more concerned about the kicking and some missed tackles.

Also, Minnesota probably has the 2nd best set of DT's in the NFL. Unfortunately, Jacksonville probably has the best.

In spite of our bellyaching, the OL is better than it was a year ago. I expect both backs to do better than 3.9 yds per carry this year.
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
Alexander said:
They can show you that we surrendered no sacks. How exactly can you see pressures from the stat sheet?

NFL.com lists the Vikings with one quarterback hurry for the game...

By reading that, you would think Bledsoe left with a clean jersey and wasn't touched. Both he and Romo were running for their lives.

And yet, they combined for 418 yards passing...

Here's hoping they're running for their lives like that EVERY game... LOL...
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Looked like a mentally tired team to me overall I think the few days they will have off is going to help to refreash this team. I expect they will be back on the field Tuesday to get ready for Jacksonville
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
silverbear said:
NFL.com lists the Vikings with one quarterback hurry for the game...

You know those statistics are very subjective right? A team can and will grade differently based on the type of protection called. I assure you, there would be more than one based off team grades.

I can guarantee you however, the coaching staff wasn't as pleased as you appear to be, nor as disappointed as some here are.

But our protection clearly was not good and certainly not how zero sacks and 1 "hurry" indicate.
 

SMCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
26
dbair1967 said:
probably my one and only post for a few days, as I'm heading to Vegas for the weekend...

very disappointing end to preseason...our 1st team got whooped physically on both lines tonight, cant really make excuses, they just got abused...OL was absolutely putrid...just awful...I know getting Adams back will help some, but he cant make the other 4 guys suddenly look good more often than not...we play alot of teams with good defensive fronts this yr and what I saw tonight wont hardly get it done against any of them

I have no doubt that you watched the game, but I have o wonder if you had any idea what you were actually seeing, and have any understanding of football. It is quite obviuos that you are just commenting on what you saw instead of looking at the game and tring to understand what was happening and why.

1) as mentioned, OL very poor in run and pass blocking...and it wasnt one guy either...all 5 starters got man-handled by the Vikes front 7, they looked like the 85 Bears against our offense in the first half, and they are NOT the 85 Bears...we either have a bunch of real stiffs on the OL or the worst OL coach in football...at this point I think it might be both

Yes, the OL had a terrible game run blocking, BUT we also kept running the ball right into 8 man fronts, even the announcers kept saying they had 8 men in the box. Heck, alot of the times they have 6 guys ON the line of scrimmage. Not very many teams are going to look anything other than terrible when they try and consistanly run the ball into 8 and 9 man fronts (there were times when Minnesota did put 9 men in the box even). Heck, in a regular season game, Parcells is not going to keep running the ball into 8 man fronts, he will let Bledsoe and company throw the ball. You also have to keep in mind that Minnesota 1st team D threw the entire house at our 1st team O. They were blitzing, and stunting and moving guys around left and right.

2) while alot of people have been singing the praises of the starting D, you might want to look at a few disturbing numbers...such as "0"...thats the number of sacks out starting D got in the last 3 preseason games...other than a couple plays our starting D got absolutely no pass rush whatsoever, and this is a 3 game thing now...seems we still have an issue trying to force turnovers as well...I think Henry has the only turnover forced by our starters

Once a again a case of not have any understanding of what you are seeing. Dallas has blitzed very very little this preseason. That is why the sacks have not been coming. And the part that really shows you are not understanding what you are saying is that you are leaving out that the 3-4 D's biggest strength, is the flexability that it GIVES you with blitzes. A 3-4 team that does not blitz is NOT going to consistantly get pressure on the QB, because very seldom are the DL on a 3-4 D good pass rushers. Look at Pittsburg for example. Their starting DL had only 9.5 sacks all last years, and this is on a team that got 44 sacks last year. The sacks come from all the different combinations of blitzes that you can throw at a team and while still only sending 5 guys to the QB.

3) what we saw tonight is a good case for why you dont sign old kickers...I dont care what his history was, he kicked poorly all of camp and he kicked awful tonight..he will lose games for us this yr, period. I think his issue at this point is more mental than physical

Kicker is a bit of a concern, but I have to believe that Venderjagt's biggest problem in his groin injury. They were saying that before the game he was consistanly making 45 yard FG's with ease, then after he kicks off, all of a sudden he starts missing again. I really wonder if his groin was not soar again. You don't going from hitting 92% of your FG's, and the most accurate kicker in NFL history to having mental issues over 1 kick. My ONLY concern with Vanderjagt is if his groin is going to be healthy enough to let him be the kicker that he was the last few years. Just looking at him on the sideline, you can see that it is not mental. Guys who let things get in their head don't walk around with smirks on their face when they miss a FG.

the above 3 reasons are why we've been mediocre for Parcell's 3 seasons here, and unless they are improved rather quickly we will be mediocre again...you cant win in this league if you cant block and rush the passer some, and we can do niether...it also doesnt help your cause when you cant find a kicker who can even make the gimmee's more often than not...we've now missed 3 fg's in the last two games, none were over 35 yds

If I were Parcells, Ireland and Jones I'd be working OT on the phones looking for OL help and a kicker...as I've said for a couple yrs now, the pass rush thing just isnt going to work out until someone else is designing the scheme so we will have to make do with what we have...but there are definite reasons for concern

David

No, the reasons you list below only show that while you watch the games you have no understanding of what you are actually seeing. The reason we have been mediocre the last three years is because the team that Parcells inherited when he took over was completely devoit of any real talent. Heck, only a VERY small handful of players from the team 3 years ago are still on the team. Parcells has had to completely rebuild this team from scratch. That is why we have been mediocre the last 3 years.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
My biggest problem with the D is the high passing precentage of the other teams. You claim zero sacks by the starting defense. Thats nothing, they really arn't on the field all that long. Abram Elam is a guy I want to keep, but what safety pays with his spot? It won't be Williams, so you are left with Watkins, Davis, and Marcus Coleman. I know, everyone says Coleman, but there is a problem with that. Coleman dual role and play CB which is a huge plus considering we have to keep 2 kickers. My guess. Willie Pile will be looking for a job.

I trust that the oline (barring injury) will be plenty good when Adams gets back and TO is on the field. Those 8-9 men in the box will stop or they will get their lunch money taken.

As for kicking. Wow, it gives you a thousand questions why Jerry didn't go after Vinatieri when it's known he doesn't have kickoff problems and is also known to make the big kicks. (especially after watching Vanderjagt shank one that would have taken them to the Superbowl)
 

SMCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
26
Double Trouble said:
I really wonder if a lot of fans have the slightest clue about what they're really seeing when they're watching a game.

Minnesota consistently played 8 (and more) in the box. NO did the same. Rivera and Gurode had some terrible plays, but most of the stifling run defense was because they simply had more guys than we could block. I think Parcells wanted to put this OL under as much duress as he could. The playcalling and the protection didn't adjust, I believe for that very reason. That may be why in his post game comments, Parcells seemed much more concerned about the kicking and some missed tackles.

Also, Minnesota probably has the 2nd best set of DT's in the NFL. Unfortunately, Jacksonville probably has the best.

In spite of our bellyaching, the OL is better than it was a year ago. I expect both backs to do better than 3.9 yds per carry this year.

I could not agree more. So many fans here try and post like football experts, but have NO understanding of what they are seeing and why they are seeing it.
 

SMCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
26
Alexander said:
You know those statistics are very subjective right? A team can and will grade differently based on the type of protection called. I assure you, there would be more than one based off team grades.

I can guarantee you however, the coaching staff wasn't as pleased as you appear to be, nor as disappointed as some here are.

But our protection clearly was not good and certainly not how zero sacks and 1 "hurry" indicate.

I watched the first half of the game, and given what Minnesota was doing, our pass protection was pertty good. There were a couple of missed blocks but most of the pressure came on misdirection plays where you try and suck in the defenders. Anytime you run a misdirection and role the QB out the other way, if the D does not bite on the fake, the QB WILL have pressure in his face EVERY time. Because the outside guy is ALWAYS left unblocked and you are tring to suck him in. I can remember atleast two different times when that happened in the first half (one was going to be a short pass to the TE in the flat, and the other was where they had the roughing the passer penelty, and they were tring to throw the ball deep to TO).
 

Awakened

the Dude abides
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
1,228
I saw every play of the game. Here is my take:

- The first team running game looked awful. Julius had a look on his face like "what the crap is going on?" He never got a chance to even start running with the ball - except for a nice run on a short pass.
- I thought the pass blocking was pretty good.
- They were daring us to pass - stacking the line and blitzing a lot.
- Do you think that starting a rookie free agent at LT in place of a Pro Bowl LT would make a difference in the OL performance? Hmmm, I wonder.
- This was the last pre-season game. Usually starters don't play as much in these games. They are thinking about the start of the season. I'm not wanting to make lame excuses, but I don't think they were as "up" for this game as they were the last game.
- Our OL is still pretty average, but it is deeper. There is not much difference in the first team and second team OL - especially with Flozell out. Kosier/Proctor, Gurode/Johnson, Pettiti/Fabini/Columbo/McQ are all pretty even in ability (though the young guys still have potential to surpass the older guys).
- I wonder if the Carpenter/Burnett combo in our nickel defense is definitely going to remain that way. Something is wrong with our 4-2-5 nickel D. I wonder if the problem lies with these two?
- Add T.O. (who barely played) and Flozell to this offense, and you've got to think it will be better. Personally, I think Bledsoe could very well set Cowboys' records for passing yards this season.
 

SMCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
26
Awakened said:
I saw every play of the game. Here is my take:

- The first team running game looked awful. Julius had a look on his face like "what the crap is going on?" He never got a chance to even start running with the ball - except for a nice run on a short pass.
- I thought the pass blocking was pretty good.
- They were daring us to pass - stacking the line and blitzing a lot.
- Do you think that starting a rookie free agent at LT in place of a Pro Bowl LT would make a difference in the OL performance? Hmmm, I wonder.
- This was the last pre-season game. Usually starters don't play as much in these games. They are thinking about the start of the season. I'm not wanting to make lame excuses, but I don't think they were as "up" for this game as they were the last game.
- Our OL is still pretty average, but it is deeper. There is not much difference in the first team and second team OL - especially with Flozell out. Kosier/Proctor, Gurode/Johnson, Pettiti/Fabini/Columbo/McQ are all pretty even in ability (though the young guys still have potential to surpass the older guys).
- I wonder if the Carpenter/Burnett combo in our nickel defense is definitely going to remain that way. Something is wrong with our 4-2-5 nickel D. I wonder if the problem lies with these two?
- Add T.O. (who barely played) and Flozell to this offense, and you've got to think it will be better. Personally, I think Bledsoe could very well set Cowboys' records for passing yards this season.

Very good recap.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Awakened said:
- They were daring us to pass - stacking the line and blitzing a lot.

Yup, and passing is exactly what we did.

39 of 56 for 418 yards total and 30 of 45 for 349 for air Romo.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,289
Reaction score
19,696
dbair1967 said:
probably my one and only post for a few days, as I'm heading to Vegas for the weekend...

very disappointing end to preseason...our 1st team got whooped physically on both lines tonight, cant really make excuses, they just got abused...OL was absolutely putrid...just awful...I know getting Adams back will help some, but he cant make the other 4 guys suddenly look good more often than not...we play alot of teams with good defensive fronts this yr and what I saw tonight wont hardly get it done against any of them

1) as mentioned, OL very poor in run and pass blocking...and it wasnt one guy either...all 5 starters got man-handled by the Vikes front 7, they looked like the 85 Bears against our offense in the first half, and they are NOT the 85 Bears...we either have a bunch of real stiffs on the OL or the worst OL coach in football...at this point I think it might be both

2) while alot of people have been singing the praises of the starting D, you might want to look at a few disturbing numbers...such as "0"...thats the number of sacks out starting D got in the last 3 preseason games...other than a couple plays our starting D got absolutely no pass rush whatsoever, and this is a 3 game thing now...seems we still have an issue trying to force turnovers as well...I think Henry has the only turnover forced by our starters

3) what we saw tonight is a good case for why you dont sign old kickers...I dont care what his history was, he kicked poorly all of camp and he kicked awful tonight..he will lose games for us this yr, period. I think his issue at this point is more mental than physical

the above 3 reasons are why we've been mediocre for Parcell's 3 seasons here, and unless they are improved rather quickly we will be mediocre again...you cant win in this league if you cant block and rush the passer some, and we can do niether...it also doesnt help your cause when you cant find a kicker who can even make the gimmee's more often than not...we've now missed 3 fg's in the last two games, none were over 35 yds

If I were Parcells, Ireland and Jones I'd be working OT on the phones looking for OL help and a kicker...as I've said for a couple yrs now, the pass rush thing just isnt going to work out until someone else is designing the scheme so we will have to make do with what we have...but there are definite reasons for concern

David

nice way to throw a jab at parcells. yet again another fan who offers no possible solutins to the problem only stating the OBVIOUS.

so the alternative to the three medicore years (two of which werrre winning seasons) is 5-11. wow great alternative isn't it?

vandy sucks, but he was one of the best available kickers....you go on previous performance else what else do you have. that was a stupid statement on your part.

did you even bother to notice that vikings played with 8 man fronts the whole night? do you seriously think teams will do that in regular season? and if they do what do you think the result will be with TO and glenn on the field?

the D was playing the same scheme the entire preseason, not running anything special and just going with players running and carrying simple assignements. did you notice we stayed in base defense against 3 Wr sets? do you think we will do that in regular season.

you happened to point out we got no sacks, let me happen to point out the points given up...did you notice that? isn't that what matters? did you check the opposition completion percentage? nahhh...I guess you didn't.
 
Top