Potential playoff bracket/s

[Direwolf63]

Thanks for looking out.
If we do that than we won't know untill after the wildcard games play out correct?

That is correct.

 

[Eric_Boyer]

That's not true. The number 1 seed plays the lowest seed that's left. So if the 3 and 5 seed win Dallas plays the 5 seed. If 3 and 4 then Dallas plays the 4 seed. If 5 and 6 wins Dallas would play 6 seed. If 4 and 6 wins then Dallas plays 6 seed

you just repeated what he said. the #3 seed is the only team we can't face in our first game.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

you just repeated what he said. the #3 seed is the only team we can't face in our first game.

No I Didn't repeat. He said Dallas would play the highest seed which is false. Reading comprehension pal

 

[JBS]

No I Didn't repeat. He said Dallas would play the highest seed which is false. Reading comprehension pal

It's all wording

Highest...6 is "higher" than any other seed..based on numerical value

Or

Lowest....6 is the "lowest" based on seeding value

Yall are saying the same thing

 

[Irvin88_4life]

It's all wording

Highest...6 is "higher" than any other seed..based on numerical value

Or

Lowest....6 is the "lowest" based on seeding value

Yall are saying the same thing

He said highest seed.....that's not the same as lowest seed. I'm not a mind reader I go by what's written.

 

[JBS]

He said highest seed.....that's not the same as lowest seed. I'm not a mind reader I go by what's written.

I explained to you why people get confused

Everything else he said made things pretty clear

 

[JBS]

Anyways...back to the bracket...here would be an amazing scenario

Packers beat Lions

Skins beat Hawks

Packers beat Giants

Dallas beats Skins

Packers beat Falcons

Packers @ Cowboys nfc championship

Wed walk to the super bowl

 

[Eric_Boyer]

He said highest seed.....that's not the same as lowest seed. I'm not a mind reader I go by what's written.

again, you both were saying the same thing
the only team the cowboys will not play in their first game is the #3 seed.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

I explained to you why people get confused

Everything else he said made things pretty clear

Doesn't stop the fact that he said something different. We didn't say the same thing. He might have meant something else but it wasn't written correctly......got it

 

[Eric_Boyer]

Doesn't stop the fact that he said something different. We didn't say the same thing. He might have meant something else but it wasn't written correctly......got it

wow. let it go. I pointed out how you were making the same claim. sorry you stopped at his first sentence and failed to understand his greater point

 

[Irvin88_4life]

again, you both were saying the same thing
the only team the cowboys will not play in their first game is the #3 seed.

We didn't say the same thing. He said highest seed which is incorrect. Period. I can mean to say anything but if I write it wrong then its wrong

 

[JBS]

We didn't say the same thing. He said highest seed which is incorrect. Period. I can mean to say anything but if I write it wrong then its wrong

So you aren't a mind reader?

 

[Eric_Boyer]

We didn't say the same thing. He said highest seed which is incorrect. Period. I can mean to say anything but if I write it wrong then its wrong

highest and lowest are ambiguous terms. he was correct about us not playing the 3rd seed.

 

[slomoxn]

In everyone's scenario they have GB already winning, I never discount the VaGiants in the playoffs, for some reason they come alive this time of year.

 

[DallasCowboys2080]

highest and lowest are ambiguous terms. he was correct about us not playing the 3rd seed.

That is correct.

So is it a lock that the hawks are #3?

 

[Direwolf63]

So is it a lock that the hawks are #3?

The Seahawks can move to #2 if they win and Atlanta loses. Anything other than that, and they are the #3 seed.

 

[Virginia-Dave]

I was just reading some interesting stats regarding the #1 seeded teams:

Since 1975 the #1 seed has reached the Super Bowl 46 times. 23 have won it, 23 have lost it. In the 90's the #1 seed dominated, winning it all 7 times. From 2000 - 2012, only 2 #1's won the Super Bowl (03 Pats, 09 Saints), but the last 3 Super Bowls featured #1 seed in AFC vs #1 seed in NFC. Hopefully that most recent trend continues this season.

 

[DB_Cooper]

I see us playing who ever plays Seattle. I don't think Seattle is as good as advertised and will be one and done. Most likely Detroit or Washington will be who we play in the second round.

 

[EMMITTnROY]

I legitimately think either the Lions or Commanders can upset the Seahawks in the first round. Seattle isn't the same since losing Thomas and Chancellor. And their o-line is a mess. As is their running game.
My official prediction: we play whoever is the 6 seed cause they will beat the Seahawks.

 

[Don Corleone]

Depending on week 17 results, and wild card results, we could play any one of these teams in the Divisional Round:

Giants
Falcons
Commanders
Seahawks
Packers

So basically nothing is set yet.