Carson
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 37,805
- Reaction score
- 66,544
That really means a lot coming from youI'll trust your judgment that that needed to be bolded.
That really means a lot coming from youI'll trust your judgment that that needed to be bolded.
i don't mind 'flex' if it's more pertaining to backups and rotation types.Yeah, I hate that position flex crap. Ruined many potential careers IMO.
Ditto with Von Miller who off the ball, wont wont make great INT plays, or a master coverage guy, but his marks come up big time as a pass rusher.His instincts for linebacker aren’t all that great.
His instincts for rushing the QB are rare.
The penny will drop eventually, but it will be too late. I think Dan Quinn needs to explain why he doesn't use Parsons like the players you quoteDitto with Von Miller who off the ball, wont wont make great INT plays, or a master coverage guy, but his marks come up big time as a pass rusher.
But Parsons is being used too often like a DE, and taking on 340 lb OT's on virtually an every down basis, is gonna eventually wear him out.
Be different if he were in a similar role as Miller or Hasson Riddick., or a 3-4 scheme such as TJ Watt is playing in Pittsburgh.
Flex is a good thing. It's only bad when you make it your primary draft strategy, then it's stupid. We misused "flex".i don't mind 'flex' if it's more pertaining to backups and rotation types.
That comes in very handy on both injury situation subs and also game day active list with the numbers too.
But not with invested projected starters, that's when it does stunt a player's growth, ..ala Byron Jones at FS, instead of CB.
Shouldnt this be in the ROSTER ZONE? If your going to do this for EVERY player how about putting in the right place?https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/progress-report-golston-saved-his-best-for-last
His plays dipped from his rookie year to his 2nd year.
So is this that 3rd year fork in the road for him to improve.
I never been overly impressed but not down on him either. But he does need to step up. Do they draft a possible replacement for if he doesn't.
It pertains to the team, not really roster related as to transactions.Shouldnt this be in the ROSTER ZONE? If your going to do this for EVERY player how about putting in the right place?
AS if you dont know.It pertains to the team, not really roster related as to transactions.
Why do you care?
ExactlyI agree and I honestly don’t get their insistence on putting him at DT but I guess that’s the only way he can get on the field.
I agree. He needs to continue to add size and strength. His play style is with strong leverage and hands. He seems to have pretty decent instincts. Look at some plays he made against the run and he flashed a little. He is the kinda guy that can develop into a starting role or solid rotational piece.He provides a strong rotation.
There is nothing to complain about here.
If we drafted him in round 1 then sure it would be ok to be upset. For where we got him I’m happy with how he plays. Good player imo.