percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
So 5 of the other 6 are TE. This is not even a fair comparison. If we want to do a fair comparison do it with the #1 targets for WR's
It's not about position or deeper targets. All the receivers in the sample below are wide receivers, and all the targets are 15+yards.Yeah the first thing I that I saw was that they are tight ends so this comparison is not totally fair.
Same quarterbacks from OP
15+yard targets to WR only
Smith
12 of 23 466 yd 4 td 0 int 137.2
Brady
22 of 41 617 yd 3 td 2 int 102.9
Cousins
7 of 19 199 yd 2 td 0 int 111.5
Wentz
14 of 40 486 yd 4 td 1 int 104.7
Rodgers
8 of 21 300 yd 2 td 1 int 97.8
Prescott
to Bryant 2 of 12 54 yd 0 td 0 int 45.8
to others 7 of 9 226 yd 1 td 0 int 155.7
Remember, these are the league's top-rated passers, so most of the players they target are going to have high passer ratings on their targets, no matter what position they play. The point of the OP is that when a guy with a low passer rating on his targets is your most-targeted receiver, your QB's passer rating suffers.