Are you sure calling a timeout when you don't have any isn't a 15 yard penalty? For some reason I think it is.
So if the O does it faster the D is SOL?If the offense substitutes, then the defense allowed a substitution too - you just gotta be quick enough!
So if the O does it faster the D is SOL?
Why does Green Bay seem to be better at this than others?
I don't see why anyone would think it's cheap. It's pure genius, yet simple to doI have debate going at work on whether or not Aaron Rodgers constantly catching teams with 12 men on the field for a 5 yard penalty and/or a free play (which is almost always a long pass) is 'cheap' or not.
I don't remember the Cowboys being caught by this earlier this season.
My personal opinion is it is a legit tactic, however, I have a number of buddies who believe it's a BS cheap tactic and mastering the way Rodgers has and using it as a 'strategy' is goes against the spirit of the game.
What do you think?
So how does Rodgers catch everyone? Or maybe it just seems that wayNo, when the offense substitutes the officials are supposed to give the defense a reasonable time to respond with their own substitution. That's why you see an official stand over the ball to prevent the snap.
Like fake eligible receivers?I don't see why anyone would think it's cheap. It's pure genius, yet simple to do
Here is the letter of the law:So if the O does it faster the D is SOL?
Why does Green Bay seem to be better at this than others?
So how does Rodgers catch everyone? Or maybe it just seems that way
I would be pissed if our QB knowingly had that opportunity and didn't take it. As for our D, they need to hustle their butts off the field when leaving.I have debate going at work on whether or not Aaron Rodgers constantly catching teams with 12 men on the field for a 5 yard penalty and/or a free play (which is almost always a long pass) is 'cheap' or not.
I don't remember the Cowboys being caught by this earlier this season.
My personal opinion is it is a legit tactic, however, I have a number of buddies who believe it's a BS cheap tactic and mastering the way Rodgers has and using it as a 'strategy' is goes against the spirit of the game.
What do you think?
It seems the same as using a hard count to draw defenders off-sides. It does seem a little cheezy at times, but I wouldn't call it cheap.I have debate going at work on whether or not Aaron Rodgers constantly catching teams with 12 men on the field for a 5 yard penalty and/or a free play (which is almost always a long pass) is 'cheap' or not.
I don't remember the Cowboys being caught by this earlier this season.
My personal opinion is it is a legit tactic, however, I have a number of buddies who believe it's a BS cheap tactic and mastering the way Rodgers has and using it as a 'strategy' is goes against the spirit of the game.
What do you think?
That is cheating and nfl will hand down punishment if we did thatYep, Dallas just needs to counter his BS by having some one pretend to get banged up.
That is cheating and nfl will hand down punishment if we did that
I agree with the OP .. It is CHEAP and DIRTY . even though it is legal
To those arguing this, remember that in a game YOU try to earn yards and points through your own effort .. run or pass . when you establish a strategy in your play book to draw flags and fouls on your opponent this is cheap and dirty and nothing less cheap or dirty than a playing faking a foul as being held or fouled .. you are not playing the game ..