Well, apparently Bill Parcells disagrees with the "true definition." This means one of two things.FuzzyLumpkins;1180124 said:so what if according to the true definition we are blitzing someone on every play?
the blitz is sometimes coming from the right the left or the middle.
theogt;1180128 said:Well, apparently Bill Parcells disagrees with the "true definition." This means one of two things.
1) The "true defintion" is wrong.
OR
2) You're misreading the "true definition."
Take your pick.
Here's the quote:Screw The Hall;1180136 said:This definition seems to support both of your arguements. Hopefully it helps you settle on a happy medium. It does seem like the best definition I've seen so far.
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/columnists/cs-061118haughonbears,0,4586772.column
About half way down the first sentence under the Experience Helps heading.
Eh...sometimes OLBs start off the line of scrimmage to disguise the rush. This isn't blitzing. That leaves the 5+ men part.By definition, a blitz occurs either when a defender who isn't on the line of scrimmage rushes the quarterback or more than four players rush the passer.
My God. Read the first post in this thread. You can fight logic all you want but it gets you nowhere.FuzzyLumpkins;1180137 said:give his exact quote in context then well talk. if he said we didnt blitz more than we normally do it could easily be construed he was saying more blitzers instead of your interpretation of more times.
Screw The Hall;1180136 said:This definition seems to support both of your arguements. Hopefully it helps you settle on a happy medium. It does seem like the best definition I've seen so far.
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/columnists/cs-061118haughonbears,0,4586772.column
About half way down the first sentence under the Experience Helps heading.
theogt;1180138 said:Here's the quote:
Eh...sometimes OLBs start off the line of scrimmage to disguise the rush. This isn't blitzing. That leaves the 5+ men part.
theogt;1180140 said:My God. Read the first post in this thread. You can fight logic all you want but it gets you nowhere.
If a corner or safety rushes the passer and the LB goes into coverage that is more akin to a zone blitz, which is not technically a blitz.Screw The Hall;1180142 said:If a corner or a saftey come it's a blitz though all day long ... no matter how many come.
The definition wasn't perfect but it's not completely dependent on a set number coming either ... and there is truth in that.
FuzzyLumpkins;1180110 said:If this is true, then please do. have him qualify the definition.
theogt;1180144 said:If a corner or safety rushes the passer and the LB goes into coverage that is more akin to a zone blitz, which is not technically a blitz.
A zone blitz can be where a LB OR a safety OR a CB rushes and a lineman drops into coverage. Do I have to teach you everything?FuzzyLumpkins;1180152 said:Actually a zoneblitz is when a LB blitzes and a dlineman drops into coverage normally on the other side of the formation. it was used to hose WCO blocking schemes.
linebackers often go into coverage.
BigDFan5;1180147 said:Its true, I am one of the moderators of the about.com football forum. I will get back with you tommorrow with his answer
theogt;1180153 said:A zone blitz can be where a LB OR a safety OR a CB rushes and a lineman drops into coverage. Do I have to teach you everything?
A DB is either a safety or a cornerback. Wow, you're learning a lot today!FuzzyLumpkins;1180157 said:learn to read: he said db blitzes and LB drops back. youre attempts at belittling me are pretty sad illiterate one.
theogt;1180160 said:A DB is either a safety or a cornerback. Wow, you're learning a lot today!
Oh is that what I said?FuzzyLumpkins;1180162 said:well perhaps you should learn that when a LB drops into coverage and a db blitzes that ISNT a zone blitz like you said it was.
Sorry, I don't have the time to teach you about football and how to read.theogt;1180153 said:A zone blitz can be where a LB OR a safety OR a CB rushes and a lineman drops into coverage. Do I have to teach you everything?