Discussion in 'NFL Zone' started by Aven8, Jan 16, 2021.
The other lady sounded just fine
This game... it's all Green Bay.
At halftime, Goff had a QBR 20-something points higher than Rodgers.
That’s why QBR is a stupid stat.
If I ran the board I would have locked the thread immediately after he posted it just to piss him off even more.
#1 offense making #1defense look bad. Devontae taking ramsey to school.
His market value is $14 million a year and his agent is Drew Rosenhaus. That’s a big no
And does anybody believe a one-dimensional offense led by Goff can bring this team back, even with McVay as coordinator.
2300 yards, 30 TDs, 5.0 ypc over the past two seasons.
His productivity per carry is off the charts.
Watching this game one night get the wrong impression that running the ball and front 7 pressure can help win games
If you’re getting this impression please turn your TV off and read previous posts by @Idgit going back years and years where he tells us that the running game has no correlation with winning
Lambeau and Gillette are among the shadiest places to play in the play-offs.
I would be surprised if the Packers let him walk. If they do he’ll certainly have starting opportunities elsewhere.
Calling on Mods.....smh
Another good example of why looking at one pure stat is beyond meaningless.
KM can learn a lot by watching Green Bay. How to control TOP, redzone efficiency which he is below average at. Also how to utilize split backs correctly(GB has trio going this game) and how not to get off to horrendously slow starts
Why I'm not sold on KM at all
Sometimes Rodgers can be amazing.
This is why I said these stats about Zeke rushing against stacked boxes is absurd, especially with our QB. The stats aren’t going to show whether the RG is forcing other looks that open up the passing game. The reality is, Dak and Goff are top 1 and 2 in play-action passing, meaning the offenses are heavily dependent on the threat of the run.
Look at Rodgers now.. he’s basically got all day..
He will be gone.
They aren’t paying him 12-14 a year
Rodgers is on another level.
You’re a GB fan and not a Cowboys fan so I understand why you’re saying this
the answer is clearly NO
You draft young hungry RBs not vetrans you will have to overpay to underachieve