xWraithx
Benched
- Messages
- 3,449
- Reaction score
- 1
THUMPER;3202136 said:Yep, and almost all of them are on my ignore list.
Ignore list is such a cop-out and generally a reserved course of action for *******.
THUMPER;3202136 said:Yep, and almost all of them are on my ignore list.
xWraithx;3202447 said:Ignore list is such a cop-out and generally a reserved course of action for *******.
VietCowboy;3202458 said:We would have more points, if only we actually made more FGs. Sure, they're not TDs, but 3 points is 3 points.
BrAinPaiNt;3202463 said:Actually it is the actions of one who is willing to take the high road and not fall into the trap of feeding a person who more often than not is trolling.
Nice post SilverBear.
BrAinPaiNt;3202463 said:Actually it is the actions of one who is willing to take the high road and not fall into the trap of feeding a person who more often than not is trolling.
Nice post SilverBear.
Hostile;3202085 said:Great post Bear. Garrett's and Romo's detractors need to saddle up to the bar next to TO's shills and order the crow.
Sometimes, it's not as simple as trolling. Sometimes two people just don't get along and their natural dislike carries over from thread to thread even though their not violating any rules. When that's the case, it's in their best interest to put each other on ignore.xWraithx;3202519 said:I disagree...
if someone is trolling they would be banned, per the rules, correct?
so the poster wouldn't even be reading their posts, as they wouldn't be posting
putting someone on ignore isn't taking any road except the easy road by ignoring someone whose opinion you disagree with.
booyah.
WoodysGirl;3202586 said:Sometimes, it's not as simple as trolling. Sometimes two people just don't get along and their natural dislike carries over from thread to thread even though their not violating any rules. When that's the case, it's in their best interest to put each other on ignore.
Putting someone on ignore is the best way to save themselves from an infraction, suspension, or even banning simply because their argument with said person always degenerates into personal attacks and drama.
Boo Ya
Eskimo;3202317 said:He did it in less games in 2008.
casmith07;3202002 said:Well I think that your 26 to 26 in TD passes is more of a push than it is advantage to 2008, but a well-written post overall!
Hostile;3202085 said:Great post Bear. Garrett's and Romo's detractors need to saddle up to the bar next to TO's shills and order the crow. The funny thing is, most of them are the exact same guys for all three situations.
kmd24;3202181 said:It's really ridiculous. This characterization is based off his demeanor in press conferences and the fact that he has given his players a few days off in the past, and the training camps without tackling.
Meanwhile, as you said, Dallas has been one of the most injury-free (knock on wood) teams in the league, and they're one of the most physical teams in the playoffs. Nothing soft about these Cowboys.
jobberone;3202195 said:I'm off the fence with Garrett but we're still not scoring enough points compared to how many yards we're putting up. That still needs to get better.
Idgit;3202277 said:Can I just co-sign all of this? Great OP and right on the money.
big dog cowboy;3202298 said:Very good post Silverbear. I enjoyed reading that.
joshjwc9;3202479 said:As always, SB's posts are very intriguing and bring up great discussion!
djdoug;3202486 said:This post is one of the reasons I love coming here.Great observations from a real fan of the Dallas Cowboys.Its great to see a clear headed and fair assessment of our team.
:starspin GO COWBOYS! :starspin