sonnyboy;3516146 said:So tired of reading this.
Chances our season is derailed by OL injuries is no greater than most other teams.
Just because it may be the thinnest weakest group on our team, doesn't mean it's thin or weak when compared to the league as a whole. Or even when compared to the other "contending teams".
I wouldn't trade our OL (starters and reserves) for the skins or eagles.
Cowboys 13 or more wins
Giants 10 or more wins
Eagles 8 wins
Redsucks 6 wins
SkinsFan28;3516353 said:Sorry you are sick of hearing it, and I didn't say it wouldn't hold up. But the NFC East is brutal on teams that have OL problems. I know this, I have 0-6 as a reminder. You have a qb that can stretch plays, and a strong WR corps, so all that is good, but your OL is thin, and to say it is as good as any other contender is a blind homerism. It may be "good enough", but it's an area that teams will target until it proves it is capable.
urface59;3515737 said:1. Dallas
2. NY
3. Philly
4. Washington
sonnyboy;3516146 said:So tired of reading this.
Chances our season is derailed by OL injuries is no greater than most other teams.
Just because it may be the thinnest weakest group on our team, doesn't mean it's thin or weak when compared to the league as a whole. Or even when compared to the other "contending teams".
I wouldn't trade our OL (starters and reserves) for the skins or eagles.
Cowboys 13 or more wins
Giants 10 or more wins
Eagles 8 wins
Redsucks 6 wins
Number82;3516578 said:Whats with all the Giants and Skins love?
Cowboys
Eagles
Giants
Commanders
... just like last year.
I think the Cowboys and Eagles have gotten better. Yes, I think Kolb at this point is better than McNabb. Plus Jackson, Maclin, Celek, and McCoy are another year better. The Giants are pretty bad in my opinion. I don't think McNabb and Shanny help the Commanders by more than +2 wins vs. last year.
jterrell;3516589 said:The Giants have some actual talent. Their front 4 is in the top 5 units. They have more talent than the Eagles or Washington.
The Commanders added a lot of actual football players. They aren't going to be great but they do have a coach with a proven system and more talent than in recent years. They also have some young talent for the first time in a decade. They also have the guy most motivated to beat Philly. And that head to head match-up likely decides the cellar of the division.
The Eagles have lost too much of the veteran core and don't have much to make up for it with. Westbrook, McNabb, Tra Thomas... thats lot for any team much less a team struggling with it's new defensive coordinator.
I should have said .500 or above. I think the last place team in the NFC East will be 8-8.Future;3515775 said:cosign
no way...it wouldn't surprise me if any 2 of those three others were under 500
Forgetting that I wasn't clear, see the post above for what I meant to say. As for the never happens comment, see 2008 the NFC East, NFC South, and AFC East. You nearly had 3 divisions finish with all 4 teams at 8-8 or better.T-RO;3515807 said:That never happens. I'll give you 5 to 1 odds (in manly man currency)
I was adamant about this and spouting odds and offering bets? Show me where.TheKey;3516367 said:I'm interested to see if Hostile returns to take this bet with 5-1 odds that he was adamant about earlier!
Hostile;3515744 said:1. Dallas
2. Washington
3. New York
4. Philadelphia
All will be above .500.
