Common Sense;2747113 said:He may not be there.
Hostile;2747127 said:With 69 we could get any two from among Rashad Johnson, Jarron Gilbert, Lawrence Sidbury, or Michael Johnson.
Last week 99% of the people on this forum would have had accidents in their pants to get 2 of those in the 2nd and 3rd, but to get them both in the 3rd is a disgrace.
Hostile;2747127 said:With 69 we could get any two from among Rashad Johnson, Jarron Gilbert, Lawrence Sidbury, or Michael Johnson.
Last week 99% of the people on this forum would have had accidents in their pants to get 2 of those in the 2nd and 3rd, but to get them both in the 3rd is a disgrace.
Hostile;2747127 said:With 69 and 75 we could get any two from among Rashad Johnson, Jarron Gilbert, Lawrence Sidbury, or Michael Johnson.
Last week 99% of the people on this forum would have had accidents in their pants to get 2 of those in the 2nd and 3rd, but to get them both in the 3rd is a disgrace.
Why would they? It's not as though those players were all slotted to be gone by the middle of the 2nd round.Hostile;2747127 said:Last week 99% of the people on this forum would have had accidents in their pants to get 2 of those in the 2nd and 3rd, but to get them both in the 3rd is a disgrace.
Bingo.jterrell;2747175 said:The surprise for me is the pass rusher may be there. I didn't do a single mock where MJ or Sidbury were around at 69.
Put me down for pass rusher at 69 and Rashad Johnson a few picks later.
We pull that off and I am happy as a friggin lark.
Because I have done mocks where I gave us one of those pass rushers and Rashad with 51,69.
Oh yes they were. Michael Johnson was end of the 1st by some sites.Double Trouble;2747207 said:Why would they? It's not as though those players were all slotted to be gone by the middle of the 2nd round.
Hostile;2747242 said:Oh yes they were. Michael Johnson was end of the 1st by some sites.