Rate Dak’s Performance

[WillieBeamen]

Average at best, there is something going on that we're not being told or he's doing some serious partying then showing up to up................

Nothing is going on.


This is the same QB with the same limitations. 5-0 against the NFCE, 5-5 against everybody else

 

[leeblair]

7/10. When your QB has 3TD and no INT's, you should win.

He was NOT great this game, at all, but he was not the reason we lost.

You're kidding yourself.

 

[McKDaddy]

Some of the holds were tick tacky. especially when it benefitted us. You can't control a flag happy reffing crew.

okay, but it happens weekly. there are always going to be some bad calls but you shouldn't continually be the most penalized team in the league.

 

[boysfanperiod]

LOL why were they on the field for “so long”?

Because the Cards converted nearly half of their 3rd downs and 100% of their 4th downs.

And because we couldn’t force a single turnover.

That’s good defense in your world?

Obviously, they were on the field because the Cards were converting never said they weren't. Also the cards were milking the clock which was a good strategy for them.

They were also on the field because the offense couldn't stay on the field with their usual schtick of 3 and outs. Our D didn't even have time to sub and rotate as much as they usually do.

They were gassed but still fought and nearly ended up giving the ball back to our inept offense if the refs called it right.

 

[boysfanperiod]

okay, but it happens weekly. there are always going to be some bad calls but you shouldn't continually be the most penalized team in the league.

Agreed. Discipline does come into play there.

 

[817Gill]

Overthrows and fumbles didn't help either

Sure. That’s why I gave him a 6.

 

[Nav22]

Obviously, they were on the field because the Cards were converting never said they weren't. Also the cards were milking the clock which was a good strategy for them.

They were also on the field because the offense couldn't stay on the field with their usual schtick of 3 and outs. Our D didn't even have time to sub and rotate as much as they usually do.

They were gassed but still fought and nearly ended up giving the ball back to our inept offense if the refs called it right.

Sounds like the 8-8 years. Not good enough.

 

[td33simplythebest]

Can we trade Dak for Joe Burrow?

 

[JJHLH1]

C-

3 TD’s is nice but he had another turnover late in the game which killed us.

Failed to take advantage of their weak secondary.

Too inconsistent, which is becoming his trademark.

 

[boysfanperiod]

Sounds like the 8-8 years. Not good enough.

Except without the quitting.

 

[john van brocklin]

On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate our signal caller’s performance?

A 7/8
But with the% of the cap he takes up he should be better.

 

[UncleRico]

5/C

 

[starfan1]

I give him a C now rate the line I’ll give them a D

 

[Kareemovweet]

Ill give him a 4 today.. Can't wait until the 4th to start playing decent...

 

[DFWJC]

C+

Was way off in general but did manage 3 TDs vs 1 turnover.
105 rating fine, but a bit deceiving with 226 yards passing and poor accuracy.
TDs pumped it way up.

So...C+

 

[jwooten15]

A 5. He’s adequate when his teammates carry the load. But as soon as he’s relied on to win a game, the ship starts sinking

 

[ElGatoGrande]

Does this put to rest the "Clutch" thing the homers were claiming?

Choke is the correct term! I'm cured of hoping this will ever change.

 

[phildadon86]

All the way up until he fumbled the game away.

Him not being able to make throws was the reason we was in the hole to begin with.

A win is all that matters, not being close to winning.

So then why do you complain when we win too?

We pulled within 3 after the fumble.

 

[CowboyRoy]

On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate our signal caller’s performance?

7

 

[Nav22]

Except without the quitting.

Garrett hung around for AGES because his teams supposedly “played hard” for him.

How quickly some forget.