Rate the last movie you saw

Antebellum, great flick. It was a 6 until it took a few turns. I give it a 9 overall.

Stick with it and I think you'll love it.
 
Pass2Run said:
Antebellum, great flick. It was a 6 until it took a few turns. I give it a 9 overall.

Stick with it and I think you'll love it.
Click to expand...
Yeah that was so good because of the second half of the movie.
The surprise is not there if you watch it again, however it is still good on a second watch as you notice stuff you missed before.
 
BrAinPaiNt said:
Yeah that was so good because of the second half of the movie.
The surprise is not there if you watch it again, however it is still good on a second watch as you notice stuff you missed before.
Click to expand...
Yep. A couple other ones I've seen recently "Nowhere" was OK. "Till Death" is another one I liked. And "Black Phone" was pretty good.
 
Gladiator II: 4/10

Kind of a mess, all around.

Acting: I love Denzel, but this wasn't the movie for him. His New York accent with everyone else speaking with a British accent was jarring and he seemed out of place. The main character was super wooden and stiff. Pedro Pascal was pretty good, but under utilized.

Plot: It seems like it was written by AI. It had some elements of a good story, but didn't really make sense when you think about it. It never seemed like the stakes were very high or that anything really mattered. No characters were developed. They were kind of the same throughout the movie. The plot just kind of meanders along.

Visuals: Some bad CGI here and there, but overall, the film looked pretty good. The costumes were good.

Pretty disappointing, as I loved the first one. It didn't need a sequel.
 
CyberB0b said:
Gladiator II: 4/10

Kind of a mess, all around.

Acting: I love Denzel, but this wasn't the movie for him. His New York accent with everyone else speaking with a British accent was jarring and he seemed out of place. The main character was super wooden and stiff. Pedro Pascal was pretty good, but under utilized.

Plot: It seems like it was written by AI. It had some elements of a good story, but didn't really make sense when you think about it. It never seemed like the stakes were very high or that anything really mattered. No characters were developed. They were kind of the same throughout the movie. The plot just kind of meanders along.

Visuals: Some bad CGI here and there, but overall, the film looked pretty good. The costumes were good.

Pretty disappointing, as I loved the first one. It didn't need a sequel.
Click to expand...
The guy riding a rhino, and the arena filled with water, with boat was enough to keep me from watching it.

Also, as you stated, it didn't need a sequel. The story was told.
 
Runwildboys said:
The guy riding a rhino, and the arena filled with water, with boat was enough to keep me from watching it.

Also, as you stated, it didn't need a sequel. The story was told.
Click to expand...
Movie wasn't good, but the Romans did flood the colosseum to stage naval battles in it.
 
Nosferatu.

I'd give it an 8. Story line followed the book fairly well, which I liked. Good pacing and character development.

But the vampire's accent was so thick it was hard to understand what he said, also the movie was a bit too long.

But I'd see it again if I had the time.
 
I just watched Casablanca again. This is a really good movie for a propaganda film. But as much as I like Bogart, I still find it difficult to see him as a leading man and a love interest of some beautiful Hollywood actress. To me his best movie was Sahara.
 
Creeper said:
I just watched Casablanca again. This is a really good movie for a propaganda film. But as much as I like Bogart, I still find it difficult to see him as a leading man and a love interest of some beautiful Hollywood actress. To me his best movie was Sahara.
Click to expand...
I never really cared for him as a rough guy either. He looks to be around 110 lbs, soaking wet.
 
Kraven the Hunter:

From all the fleecing of it I've heard, I expected a 3/10. Maybe it's because I'm unfamiliar with the comic book character, but I didn't think it was all that bad. The CGI animals were terrible, especially the bear, but I liked the story. The brother, at the end, was a bad idea, IMO.

Overall, I'll give it a 6.5.
 
Mufasa – I’m doing my best to get through this movie, but as you can see, I’m already surfing CowboysZone instead.

So far, this movie sucks. The music is forgettable, and the voice casting just doesn’t work for me. The CGI is impressive, though, I'll give it that.

As an OG Lion King fan, I had some hope for this, but it’s just not good.
 
SlammedZero said:
Mufasa – I’m doing my best to get through this movie, but as you can see, I’m already surfing CowboysZone instead.

So far, this movie sucks. The music is forgettable, and the voice casting just doesn’t work for me. The CGI is impressive, though, I'll give it that.

As an OG Lion King fan, I had some hope for this, but it’s just not good.
Click to expand...
The prequel no one wanted and no one asked for
 


Kind of slow horror movie. Lower budget but not many effects so that was no worry. It did build up some tension here and there but was kind of slow and did not have much of a payoff so to speak.



Have not watched this one in a long time.
I think it is probably the best Exorcist movie outside of the original.
I still like it, has some cool stuff.




Ok. Not great by any means but an ok action/comedy flick if you get bored. Kid from the boys series plays the lead role.



Just a fun shoot them up action flick. It has Robert Carlyle in it and I think he always does a good job. This movie is similar to The Condemned with Stone Cold. These are not prisoners and they are not on an island but the basic premise is the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 81 more.
Total: 5,087 (members: 181, guests: 4,906)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,537
Messages
13,817,276
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top