Don't hate...you asked.
Back up to the basis of this thread where the question was raised about pass blocking RB’s. The assumption would be that ZC is a good blocker due to his size but in fact he grades-out quite poorly in this category. PFF will give you a grade (it’s bad) if you care to look, and there are probably other services that have assigned him similar values. NFL draft buzz says – “Offers little in pass protection and poor technique at cut blocking”. The eye test also works for me and given that I’ve had to watch his games, sometimes multiple times, I have a pretty good take on his ability to put his hat in someone’s chest. So from that perspective, there’s zero relationship between ZC and one of the better blocking backs (Z. Elliot) I’ve seen in a while.
If you’re enamored with his numbers at UCLA, I assure you, they are overinflated and would have been achieved by numerous backs in this draft. Four of the nine conference games were played against teams with bottom 20 rush defenses, including Colorado who was only outdone by LA Tech. There were plenty “defense optional” memes created by the PAC’s desire to simply
not play any. This was also UCLA’s best offensive unit in a while with seniors across the line (RT being the exception) that were exceptional at executing gap-heavy blocking schemes, and they had a QB who played what felt like 8 years in a system that he could run in his sleep. Chip Kelley spread you and made it look like 7 on 7 football. Just watch how many prospects on the offensive side of the ball will be on rosters next season. It’s a running backs wet dream. Does Zeke get a Heisman with this unit or does he just finish 8th in the balloting like he did in ’15 season? Could speculate either way but ZC was in a ready-made system and wasn’t a top 10 (do they go beyond ten?) consideration. At draft time Zeke was heavier and faster than Charbonnet and the game speed is measurable. Bama players wish they had to track down ZC instead of Elliot. Think we’re forgetting how good top gear Zeke was due to his recent decline.
Other non-measurable aspects of my thoughts on ZC are based on conversations I’ve had with writers in the LA market. The takeaway was
not to expect a drop-off in production from the UCLA backfield in 2023. Although the carries will be more evenly distributed between backs, I was told to watch TJ Harden in particular and that he’s got more wiggle than ZC, but perhaps runs with less violence. I believe he averaged over 7 yrds/carry
just as ZC did. From what I remember, he had the same giant splits to run through as ZC.
I could write more on this topic but I’m sure that I’ve already stated more than anyone cares to read so I’ll be bowing out of this one. If you like the guy, you like the guy and if he's drafted by the Cowboys I hope he excels. The only comparison I see between ZC and ZE is that fact that ZC has the physical ability to tote it for a ton of carries. Zach will have a career that will make him filthy rich, including a second contract, he’s a good player, but I just don’t buy into this plug-and-play Zeke fools gold.
Now I gotta go listen to some guy tell me what Renewal by Andersen Windows can do for me.