Woods
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,460
- Reaction score
- 61
Here's what I think is likely to happen over the next month.
1. We sign PacMan as our 3rd CB. If PacMan isn't reinstated before the Draft, we will give a conditional 2009 draft pick. Otherwise, I think we'll end up giving a 5th rounder this year (assuming he's reinstated before the draft).
2. JJ is going to pull off a trade with the Lions/Bengals for either R Williams or C Johnson with our 28th overall pick. There's no WR in this year's draft who could give us the immediate result that R Williams/C Johnson can. I truly believe that JJ wants to have one more big threat opposite TO. He wanted J Walker, we now know that. He's going to pull off a trade for a WR one way or another, IMO.
3. With our 22nd overall pick, if either Cromartie, McKelvin, Talib, or Jenkins are available, we'll take a CB. (Personally, I'd just as happily take Cason at 22, but that's me.) If not, I think we'll prefer to trade back (end of Round 1/early Round 2), or else we'll take Stewart, if there's no trading partner. In that order . . . .
4. I really do believe that we will draft a FB once again this year. RED was a QB on the Cowboys when we had Moose playing. He wants the FB to be able to block and catch and be more of a weapon. Cricket stays, but I think we bring on board one more all purpose FB this Draft to rotate and compete with Cricket. The FB position will be a weapon once again. (Think of it, 2 stud WRs, top TE in the game, likely 2 top RBs. Now add in the FB who can also contribute to the passing game. Every player outside of the OL has to be accounted for.)
5. Finally, I think we draft a NT this year. Why? Spears is likely gone after this season, and ideally Ratliff takes his spot in 2009. That means we need someone to groom this year to take Ratliff's spot. It often takes interior DL a year or two to get used to the NFL. JJ will be thinking ahead and will draft a guy this year.
This does mean that there's no DMAC for us. JJ is going to use one of the 1st Rounders for a veteran WR instead.
I think this is the most likely scenario.
1. We sign PacMan as our 3rd CB. If PacMan isn't reinstated before the Draft, we will give a conditional 2009 draft pick. Otherwise, I think we'll end up giving a 5th rounder this year (assuming he's reinstated before the draft).
2. JJ is going to pull off a trade with the Lions/Bengals for either R Williams or C Johnson with our 28th overall pick. There's no WR in this year's draft who could give us the immediate result that R Williams/C Johnson can. I truly believe that JJ wants to have one more big threat opposite TO. He wanted J Walker, we now know that. He's going to pull off a trade for a WR one way or another, IMO.
3. With our 22nd overall pick, if either Cromartie, McKelvin, Talib, or Jenkins are available, we'll take a CB. (Personally, I'd just as happily take Cason at 22, but that's me.) If not, I think we'll prefer to trade back (end of Round 1/early Round 2), or else we'll take Stewart, if there's no trading partner. In that order . . . .
4. I really do believe that we will draft a FB once again this year. RED was a QB on the Cowboys when we had Moose playing. He wants the FB to be able to block and catch and be more of a weapon. Cricket stays, but I think we bring on board one more all purpose FB this Draft to rotate and compete with Cricket. The FB position will be a weapon once again. (Think of it, 2 stud WRs, top TE in the game, likely 2 top RBs. Now add in the FB who can also contribute to the passing game. Every player outside of the OL has to be accounted for.)
5. Finally, I think we draft a NT this year. Why? Spears is likely gone after this season, and ideally Ratliff takes his spot in 2009. That means we need someone to groom this year to take Ratliff's spot. It often takes interior DL a year or two to get used to the NFL. JJ will be thinking ahead and will draft a guy this year.
This does mean that there's no DMAC for us. JJ is going to use one of the 1st Rounders for a veteran WR instead.
I think this is the most likely scenario.