RECAP: Marcellus Wiley: I would take Romo over Palmer and Roethlisberger

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Reasons sited:

His attitude when there is adversity great, something we saw Roethliserger struggle with that last year.

His confidence and attitude changed the Cowboys

He is extremely poised

Remeber when he was trying to make the team and in the lunch room he was always smiling talking to everybody, stars, bench warmers and I was told that nothing hasn't changed since he became the starter

He reminds me of Brady. I sacked Brady one time and he was laughing when he got up, Romo does the same thing
 
If Palmer was on the Pats he'd be putting up Brady's numbers too, some guys are just stuck in tough situations that don't magnify their strengths. Big Ben is always going to be very average.
 
mickgreen58;1830563 said:
I could definately get used to Wiley :bow: .

Wiley has a chance to be really good at broadcasting. He is highly intelligent (Ivy League), well-spoken and poignant...
 
mickgreen58;1830563 said:
I could definately get used to Wiley :bow: .

He said a few weeks ago Peterson was better than LT so I take what he says with the grain of sizalt.

In this case though I do agree with him.
 
CATCH17;1830604 said:
He said a few weeks ago Peterson was better than LT so I take what he says with the grain of sizalt.

I know I am in the majority but, I would take Adrian Peterson over LT right now too.
 
I dont understand why Roethlisberger even gets mention. He has some big games, but averages under 200 yds a game for an offense that relies on the running game.
 
The Panch;1830608 said:
I dont understand why Roethlisberger even gets mention. He has some big games, but averages under 200 yds a game for an offense that relies on the running game.

Roethlisberger is your classic Parcell's Bus Driver type...
 
mickgreen58;1830605 said:
I know I am in the majority but, I would take Adrian Peterson over LT right now too.

I think you are in the minority.

Petersons really good don't get me wrong.

But I think LT is a smarter player. I also will take a Marathon guy in the NFL over a Sprinter.

LT is going to be there for me 16 games a season. I can't say that about Peterson.
 
mickgreen58;1830603 said:
Yep, twice in his career he racked up double digit sacks in a season.

When he was playing with Wade as the DC. As soon as he left the WP style of play, his numbers deteriorated.
 
khiladi;1830617 said:
When he was playing with Wade as the DC. As soon as he left the WP style of play, his numbers deteriorated.

He had a bad injury that had a lot to do with his numbers dropping as well.
 
khiladi;1830617 said:
When he was playing with Wade as the DC. As soon as he left the WP style of play, his numbers deteriorated.

Not as soon as WP left. In 2000 with the Bills and Wade as head coach Wiley had 10.5 sacks. Wiley then went to San Diego and had 13.0 sacks in his only pro-bowl/all-pro season. Wade was not in SD at that time.
 
mickgreen58;1830605 said:
I know I am in the majority but, I would take Adrian Peterson over LT right now too.

Majority? Anyway, give me Peterson, too. He's unreal.
 
I clearly meant to say minority. I got interrupted before I could proof read what I wrote.
 
mickgreen58;1830760 said:
I clearly meant to say minority. I got interrupted before I could proof read what I wrote.
You realize mistakes aren't allowed on this board without being corrected from multiple people. Take your spanking... :)
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,554
Messages
14,545,284
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top