RECAP: Marcellus Wiley: I would take Romo over Palmer and Roethlisberger

[Echo9]

I think you are in the minority.

Petersons really good don't get me wrong.

But I think LT is a smarter player. I also will take a Marathon guy in the NFL over a Sprinter.

LT is going to be there for me 16 games a season. I can't say that about Peterson.

Taking wear and tear into account, I'd take Peterson too. LDT doesn't have too many good years left, whereas AP is just starting.

That's a big factor.

However, if both were at the same point in their careers, It's LDT hands down.

 

[03EBZ06]

He said a few weeks ago Peterson was better than LT so I take what he says with the grain of sizalt.

Right now, I would take Peterson over LT as well.

 

[kevwun]

Something I've never liked about Roethlisberger is how long it takes him to get rid of the ball. He almost has a windup. Romo flings it out so much quicker.

 

[Idgit]

I clearly meant to say minority. I got interrupted before I could proof read what I wrote.

Yah, I knew it. I wanted to agree with you, but didn't want people to think I was dumb and thought I was in the majority, too.

 

[Eddie]

You realize mistakes aren't allowed on this board without being corrected from multiple people. Take your spanking...

Wow, you guys should check out the teacher's forums. It's hilarious.

Make sure grammar, spell, math, historical, and any other check is on before hitting the post button.

Instead of replying to people's requests for help and information, the posters on the teachers forum rip on grammar, spelling, and anything else they can find. It's very funny and pretty ridiculous.

 

[CATCH17]

I would still take LT over Peterson not accounting age.

Even with age LT may still have a longer career.

Dont forget this guy was the leagues most valuable player only a year ago.

Hes there every sunday as well.

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Would anyone take Ben R. or Palmer over Romo?

Oh wait, I heard Gosselin a few weeks ago say he'd take Palmer. Why? Because he was a #1 overall pick, of course.

 

[the kid 05]

Would anyone take Ben R. or Palmer over Romo?

Oh wait, I heard Gosselin a few weeks ago say he'd take Palmer. Why? Because he was a #1 overall pick, of course.

that being said so was ryan leaf : stupid "experts"

 

[AmishCowboy]

Roethlisberger is your classic Parcell's Bus Driver type...

Hello, There is a lot of truth in this Statement, he won that SB on the back of the Running Game, Defense and Bad Calls.

 

[EGTuna]

Wiley is VERY good on camera or behind the mic. He subbed for Golic earlier this week on Mike&Mike and was excellent. In fact, I'd like to see just him and Golic and get rid of Greenberg.

 

[diehard2294]

I would take Romo over them as well.

 

[Da Hammer]

i have Palmer and Romo real close in ranking of QB's. Palmer is having a down year but look at the team he has around him. a bunch of morons that have either been in trouble with the law or are headcases. put him in a better team and he could very well become the best QB in the NFL

 

[theogt]

I clearly meant to say minority. I got interrupted before I could proof read what I wrote.

Intent or not, you are in the majority, in that you would take Peterson over LT. Most people would, simply because Peterson's much younger.

 

[vicjagger]

Yep, twice in his career he racked up double digit sacks in a season.

Where? In the CFL? No, wait, was it in the AFC?

 

[roughneck266]

I could definately get used to Wiley .

Me too. As long as he isn't "playing" for the Cowboys!