burmafrd;3845605 said:No most of the draft experts called Carpenter the safest pick we could have made. How quickly some forget. Turned out not to be true. There is no such thing as an absolute sure pick.
He went pretty much where he was supposed to go.dwmyers;3845640 said:Burmafrd, my recollection is that Carpenter was tagged as a late first rounder to early 2nd. A reach, in other words. Maybe not a huge reach, but a reach nonetheless. It's true, though, as you say, that people also regarded Carpenter as a safe choice. But he wasn't felt to have much upside, which led to the late first-early second assessment.
JPM;3845663 said:He went pretty much where he was supposed to go.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/TSX/2006_OLB
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2006/draft/tracker/index_exclude.html
SDogo;3845506 said:I repeat, WILL NOT be 21 till May 18th of this year.
His body is still developing. Frame is built to add strength and weight.
Who ever gets him needs to be patient. He is probably going to aggrivate the heck out ** any fan base who is expecting him to come in and get double digit sacks his first 2 years in the league but when he has had two seasons in a NFL weight program and the expierence under his belt and is still only 23...........watch out.
burmafrd;3845692 said:well your recollections were wrong. He went at about where Goose and others had him at. He was called the safest pick we could make at that point.
Don't get your panties in a wad. It was 5 years ago.
SDogo;3845506 said:I repeat, WILL NOT be 21 till May 18th of this year.
His body is still developing. Frame is built to add strength and weight.
Who ever gets him needs to be patient. He is probably going to aggrivate the heck out ** any fan base who is expecting him to come in and get double digit sacks his first 2 years in the league but when he has had two seasons in a NFL weight program and the expierence under his belt and is still only 23...........watch out.
dwmyers;3845516 said:This guy might be the Real Deal, but what is preventing him from being Bobby Carpenter II? BC was a real fetish item on this board the year we drafted him, even though most of his proponents agreed we were reaching for him in the first place.
Randy White;3845771 said:Only idiots would expect double digit sacks from players in their rookie season. One thing is getting it because the guy is a freak and another one is " expecting it "..
I "man"love Robert Quinn, but the Spencer point is very valid and should be taken into consideration. I just hate to see 2 or 3 years down the line Quinn becoming a dominant force for somebody else when we know that Spencer will never be that type of player. I'm not saying Spencer sucks, but it's fairly common knowlege that he'll never be one of the top guys at his position. Very solid, perhaps, but not " best of the best ".
Randy White;3845780 said:Nothing prevents it. Just like nothing " could " prevent Patrick Peterson from becoming the next Bruce Pickens, or Da'Quan Bowers from becoming the next Courtney Brown, or Nick Fairley from becoming the next Dan Wilkerson. All experts can do is use the same barometers that are available, their instincts and experience, and pray that they work.
And using those same measuring sticks, Bobby Carpenter does not, never has, nor ever would, become even close to be in the same league as Robert Quinn. Bringing up Carpenter's name in the same sentence as Quinn that does not include " sucks compared to " is disrespectful even to average intelligence.
dwmyers;3845852 said:You know, Jim Jeffcoat was never Harvey Martin, but Jim plus Tony Casillas plus a few other rotation guys gave us a pretty effective front. I've been impressed at times at what Victor Butler has done; OLB and ILB all could benefit from a 2-3 deep rotation.
Do you think this team would have the patience to get a guy who could end up great, even if he took a couple years to develop? If Dallas were a baseball team, could Jerry ever develop a Sandy Koufax?
DAL @ GB
IND TEN
15%
CAR @PHI
11%
JAX HOU
6%
