Robert Quinn?

Depending on price, and if Crawford is willing to take a bit of a pay cut, you're better off trying to keep both, because they play very different roles. Crawford is extremely valuable on first and second down b/c he's so good against the run (though some don't want to admit it), and that's basically the exact opposite of Quinn. So if you pair Quinn/Crawford, you're perfect opposite DLaw.
 
Depends on the price, if it is too much, release and find a replacement in the draft. You can draft competent edge rushers without spending a first or a second round draft pick on them. It will also depend on the defensive co-ordinator.
 
I don't think we'll be able to afford him.
 
Some will hate to hear it but I think the DL missed Crawford this year. If Crawford sucks as an outside pass rusher but is a good run defender which this unit was horrible at and he is good with line stunts. I liked Quinn's numbers but is a so-so run defender like bennett.
 
How about instead of paying off a guy who was clearly playing for his final contract we go out and sign 2 or 3 guys to one year deals that are hungry for their final contracts. Or instead of blowing money on a 30 year old player we spend the money on a 26 year old player.
 
Hes asking 3 year 26 w 10 guaranteed
Where did you see that?

It's good for Dallas if that is his ask. The guaranteed money is easy, and you can probably finagle a bit to make it an easy cap hit.
 
Some will hate to hear it but I think the DL missed Crawford this year. If Crawford sucks as an outside pass rusher but is a good run defender which this unit was horrible at and he is good with line stunts. I liked Quinn's numbers but is a so-so run defender like bennett.
Pretty much. Crawford was a big loss.

All the complaints about the run defense, but when you're missing Woods, Crawford, LVE...that's hard to make up for.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,017
Messages
14,506,875
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top