Rodgers may not play against Dallas

[Zordon]

i'll believe it when i see it. till then, i'm going to assume rogers sees a voodoo doctor the night before and pulls a willis reed on gameday throwing for 500 yds, 5 tds.

 

[Gridiron Man]

The way I understand it, even Cobb might not be back.

Cobb (knee) is growing healthier, but there remains no timetable for a return to practice, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

Analysis: Coach Mike McCarthy said that Cobb has ditched the Segway that ferried him about the Packers' facilities and is moving around much better. However McCarthy has yet to receive a medical update on Cobb's progress, leaving a return date decidedly unknown at this time.

 

[SportsGuru80]

Who cares we have to beat whoever is playing!

 

[coult44]

I was thinking something similar, .. sort of.

If AR does not play, that is the type of thing that our team historically would look at and think it gives us a win.

I don't want to play AR, but I don't want to take them lightly because he is not playing.

A no-named rookie QB for the Raiders threw for almost 300 yards against us. Doesn't matter who plays, we have to play good

 

[dallasdave]

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on...ght-sit-down-aaron-rodgers-for-rest-of-season

Let's hope they keep losing so they keep him out. I'm not scared of gb but you're a fool of you're one of those tough guys that says you hope he plays so gb fans can't make an excuse

If not we will rough him up.

 

[BAZ]

Who cares we have to beat whoever is playing!

And Rodgers being out makes that easier on your team. Come on son, pay attention.

 

[TTexasTT]

A no-named rookie QB for the Raiders threw for almost 300 yards against us. Doesn't matter who plays, we have to play good

what are you talking about? It absolutely makes a difference who plays.

 

[coult44]

what are you talking about? It absolutely makes a difference who plays.

We have a tendency of making rookies and little known replacements look very good. Our defense is going to give up a lot of points and a lot of yards regardless of who plays QB for the Packers. With Rogers they score at least 28, without him they score at least 24. Not a huge difference. The key to the game either way will be which of our offenses shows up.

 

[TTexasTT]

We have a tendency of making rookies and little known replacements look very good. Our defense is going to give up a lot of points and a lot of yards regardless of who plays QB for the Packers. With Rogers they score at least 28, without him they score at least 24. Not a huge difference. The key to the game either way will be which of our offenses shows up.

hahaha you already know the scores for the games according to which QB starts???@@!! LMAO

 

[coult44]

hahaha you already know the scores for the games according to which QB starts???@@!! LMAO

With our defense, YEP.....

hahaha you already know the scores for the games according to which QB starts???@@!! LMAO

Our defense give us 25.3 points per game regardless of who the opposing QB is. I figure even if Rogers is back there is NO way he will be 100%, so I don't see him having a 400 yard game on us like 4 other QB's have so far this year. But, based on whats happened so far, whoever we play will have an above average day and score least 24 points....It's not that hard to figure out, unless you have on those new Cowboys Rose glasses....

 

[windward]

With our defense, YEP.....


Our defense give us 25.3 points per game regardless of who the opposing QB is. I figure even if Rogers is back there is NO way he will be 100%, so I don't see him having a 400 yard game on us like 4 other QB's have so far this year. But, based on whats happened so far, whoever we play will have an above average day and score least 24 points....It's not that hard to figure out, unless you have on those new Cowboys Rose glasses....

Regardless of Qb?
Alex Smith 17
Bradford 7
Rg3 16
Foles 3
Ponder 23
Manning 21
McGloin 17
That's 7 out of 12 allowing less than 25 ppg.

 

[Redball Express]

Let's hope not. If the eagles lose their next two and we beat Green bay and Chicago I believe we clinch the division. According to my current yahoo scenario we would win the division even if we lose out and they win out.

The Eagles play Arizona today and then Detroit next week.

Edit: it would come down to strength of victory tiebreaker according to ESPN. So we wouldn't necessarily clinch but still we would have a very good chance.

The Iggles have it rolling so having Rogers sit would be a big break for us.

I just don't see Dallas being able to hold this division lead. And if it comes down to an Elimination game with.them..it's not a pretty picture.

 

[TTexasTT]

We have a tendency of making rookies and little known replacements look very good. Our defense is going to give up a lot of points and a lot of yards regardless of who plays QB for the Packers. With Rogers they score at least 28, without him they score at least 24. Not a huge difference. The key to the game either way will be which of our offenses shows up.
With our defense, YEP.....


Our defense give us 25.3 points per game regardless of who the opposing QB is. I figure even if Rogers is back there is NO way he will be 100%, so I don't see him having a 400 yard game on us like 4 other QB's have so far this year. But, based on whats happened so far, whoever we play will have an above average day and score least 24 points....It's not that hard to figure out, unless you have on those new Cowboys Rose glasses....

yerp derp potato... That is honestly some of the dumbest crap that Ive ever seen posted on this site... And thats a bold statement.
Rodgers is only 4pts better than the backups theyve been running out there? How many games have they won with him gone.



I dont know how some of you guys get by from day to day in real life. OMG.

 

[coult44]

yerp derp potato... That is honestly some of the dumbest crap that Ive ever seen posted on this site... And thats a bold statement.
Rodgers is only 4pts better than the backups theyve been running out there? How many games have they won with him gone.



I dont know how some of you guys get by from day to day in real life. OMG.

So let me ask you a question? How many points and yards do we give up if Rogers plays, and how many if he doesn't play? Either way we give up between 24-31 points right?

 

[TTexasTT]

So let me ask you a question? How many points and yards do we give up if Rogers plays, and how many if he doesn't play? Either way we give up between 24-31 points right?

Let me answer that with a NO.

Now, let me just straight up ask this. Is Rodger only 4 pts better than any of those backups?

 

[joseephuss]

i'll believe it when i see it. till then, i'm going to assume rogers sees a voodoo doctor the night before and pulls a willis reed on gameday throwing for 500 yds, 5 tds.

I hope he pulls a Willis Reed as well. Reed only scored two buckets and didn't really play much in that game where he made the big entrance.

 

[Teren_Kanan]

I hate this.

First of all it's impossible to not care at all about something you're posting about. Literally impossible.

And because I could care less about something doesn't mean I care a lot about said thing.

I could care less if you disregard this lesson I just taught you....but not by much.

But "I couldn't care less" doesn't meant you don't care about something at all. It just means it's at your lowest point of possible caring! I'm not saying your use of "I could care less" wasn't accurate (impossible to know, I'm not you, perhaps you care a lot more than you could), just correcting your definition of the first phrase.

 

[Picksix]

Regardless of Qb?
Alex Smith 17
Bradford 7
Rg3 16
Foles 3
Ponder 23
Manning 21
McGloin 17
That's 7 out of 12 allowing less than 25 ppg.

None of those are in the same area code as Rodgers either. Not even Foles.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

If Rodgers doesn't play the Cowboys will lay down. That's how the Cowboys do things.

They sure laid down at 21-7 this past game.

 

[dragon_mikal]

So let me ask you a question? How many points and yards do we give up if Rogers plays, and how many if he doesn't play? Either way we give up between 24-31 points right?

How about we probably win if Rodgers doesn't play and we probably lose if he does? Is that a good enough answer?