Rodgers may not play against Dallas

blackbull said:
Good. I hope nobody comes in here talking that (I want gb at full strength so they have no excuses). I want Matt Flynn!
Click to expand...

Right...I want a win, and chances are better with Flynn over Rogers [even at 50%]. I can care less about the full strength crap.
 
Great for the Cowboys but horrible for my 11-1 fantasy team :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coy
Let's hope not. If the eagles lose their next two and we beat Green bay and Chicago I believe we clinch the division. According to my current yahoo scenario we would win the division even if we lose out and they win out.

The Eagles play Arizona today and then Detroit next week.

Edit: it would come down to strength of victory tiebreaker according to ESPN. So we wouldn't necessarily clinch but still we would have a very good chance.
 
The Commander win would be more important along with either a Chicago or GB win. We could clinch before wk 17.
 
I certainly hope he doesn't play. I'm all for anything that improves our chances of winning, and the football gods certainly haven't been throwing us any bones lately when it comes to injuries.

The only thing is the NFC North is looking kinda weak right now so I wouldn't be surprised if the Pack is still in the playoff hunt come week 15.
 
I would be shocked if they put him in to play. If they lose next week I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up on IR.
 
Wow, this would be huge for Dallas. If he doesn't play, then that's honestly probably our easiest game left on the schedule. Though, we shall see.
 
StarBoyz83 said:
Watch him not play and they beat us. Lol
Click to expand...

I was thinking something similar, .. sort of.

If AR does not play, that is the type of thing that our team historically would look at and think it gives us a win.

I don't want to play AR, but I don't want to take them lightly because he is not playing.
 
if he doesn't play week 14 there will be no reason to play him. unless they run the table, they have little shot to get in.
 
ufcrules1 said:
You "couldn't care less". There is a big difference between the 2.
Click to expand...

I hate this.

First of all it's impossible to not care at all about something you're posting about. Literally impossible.

And because I could care less about something doesn't mean I care a lot about said thing.

I could care less if you disregard this lesson I just taught you....but not by much.
 
If Rodgers doesn't play the Cowboys will lay down. That's how the Cowboys do things.
 
WV Cowboy said:
I was thinking something similar, .. sort of.

If AR does not play, that is the type of thing that our team historically would look at and think it gives us a win.

I don't want to play AR, but I don't want to take them lightly because he is not playing.
Click to expand...

Right. I somehow suspect that we'll actually play GB much harder if Rogers is throwing for them.

Playing or not, I like our chances. AR won't be at 100% even if is somehow starting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 81 more.
Total: 5,026 (members: 181, guests: 4,845)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,670
Messages
13,825,375
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top