Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

2003 they had Quincy Carter, who had a lot of talent, and Parcels loved.

2004 was Testaverde

2005 was Bledsoe

Why would Bill put in the backup QB when he had these QBs?
Bill was going to make a player earn it, not just give it to them. Bill's rules favored the guys with experience. Simple as that. He has stated before that he would have put Romo in sooner if not for his trust that a vet would give the team the best chance at success.
 
We can talk about stats all day long but down 6 with 2 minutes to go in the 4th, you can trust romo to get the touchdown, can’t say the same for dak. Romo ran the 2 minute offense methodically, daks true colors show.
Romo just like Dak can run an effective 2 minute offense against some of the dogs….even against some good teams every once in awhile. But how many come in a win or go home game?
 
I think you mean, "12 other pro bowlers besides himself". Now you're just talking smack for the sake of being argumentative. You're taking the legitimate talking points about Dak, and trying to apply them to Romo. You're too good for that.
I think he's shown signs he's not.
 
I think you mean, "12 other pro bowlers besides himself". Now you're just talking smack for the sake of being argumentative. You're taking the legitimate talking points about Dak, and trying to apply them to Romo. You're too good for that.
How are they legitimate talking points for Dak but not Romo? They are having eerily the same career. I get it you guys love Romo. I was there at one point until I started watching other quarterbacks play. He didn’t have more success because he needed more help. That shouldn’t be considered an insult. What’s insulting is people trying to convince us that he’s as good or better than Montana.
 
How are they legitimate talking points for Dak but not Romo? They are having eerily the same career. I get it you guys love Romo. I was there at one point until I started watching other quarterbacks play. He didn’t have more success because he needed more help. That shouldn’t be considered an insult. What’s insulting is people trying to convince us that he’s as good or better than Montana.
"because he needed more help" is very different from "Romo needed it all which is why he choked and even when he had 12 Pro Bowlers it still wasn’t enough."

Romo made the team look better than they were, most of the time. Dak has has some good performances, but it was always surprising when he did.
 
Any debate I've had with him, though I didn't agree, he's always been reasonable, and expressed what I feel were his true beliefs...as far as I remember, anyway.
That guy has done some weird tactics in debating. With me and you it’s never gone personal whether we agree or not and it’s appreciated. You have some guys not saying anyone in particular use position anonymously to their advantage and conduct themselves in a way they wouldn’t do in person. So I appreciate that if no one else has said it.
 
"because he needed more help" is very different from "Romo needed it all which is why he choked and even when he had 12 Pro Bowlers it still wasn’t enough."

Romo made the team look better than they were, most of the time. Dak has has some good performances, but it was always surprising when he did.
But it wasn’t. And I know people will say we lost to the champs. The Cowboys from top to bottom were a better team. I will stand by that. They should’ve never lost that game. And I’d probably say 2014 and 2007 were his best chances at at least getting to a conference championship. I will never say Romo was a bad QB. But this notion that Dak needs help? He does. As did Romo. Hell as did Aikman.

I see people do this with Jalen Hurts. Oh he’s not as good as Lamar or Josh because he has talent. Nope. Im
Not gonna knock a guy for playing with talent. You still have to make key throws and decisions as he did.
 
That guy has done some weird tactics in debating. With me and you it’s never gone personal whether we agree or not and it’s appreciated. You have some guys not saying anyone in particular use position anonymously to their advantage and conduct themselves in a way they wouldn’t do in person. So I appreciate that if no one else has said it.
Man. I was determined to not take the bait, but when you come out with this garbage I just can't help myself.

You, of all people, have the nerve to suggest someone else has some "weird tactics" in debating. Imply that you never get personal. Suggest people hide behind the anonymity. Delusional is the kindest way I can come up with to describe that.

This attitude, and unwillingness and/or inability to self reflect is exactly why you get the feedback you do. From far more people than you would ever admit. Most just have a back and forth and let it go. They don't bother with you because.... why bother. There are 2 or 3, me being one of them, that do call out your BS on a more regular basis. Of course you ignore all the incidental cases involving others and accuse us of stalking or some other deflection tactic once again avoiding self reflection. You are the common denominator.

RWB has his opinion based on his experience and that's fine. That doesn't negate the experiences and observations of the many here who have a different opinion.

I still can't believe you accuse others of making it personal and hiding in anonymity. lol
 
Man. I was determined to not take the bait, but when you come out with this garbage I just can't help myself.

You, of all people, have the nerve to suggest someone else has some "weird tactics" in debating. Imply that you never get personal. Suggest people hide behind the anonymity. Delusional is the kindest way I can come up with to describe that.

This attitude, and unwillingness and/or inability to self reflect is exactly why you get the feedback you do. From far more people than you would ever admit. Most just have a back and forth and let it go. They don't bother with you because.... why bother. There are 2 or 3, me being one of them, that do call out your BS on a more regular basis. Of course you ignore all the incidental cases involving others and accuse us of stalking or some other deflection tactic once again avoiding self reflection. You are the common denominator.

RWB has his opinion based on his experience and that's fine. That doesn't negate the experiences and observations of the many here who have a different opinion.

I still can't believe you accuse others of making it personal and hiding in anonymity. lol
I’m not reading all of this. I’m just gonna say I respectfully disagree. Because you are another one of these grudge holders with this weird tactics in debating. The only time you reply to me is in a Dak related post. The agenda is clear and respectfully over it. That goes for Steve and 5Stars too. At some point you guys have got to be tired of derailing threads for the sake of replying to me.
 
I’m not reading all of this.
This says all you need to know about this kid.
I’m just gonna say I respectfully disagree. Because you are another one of these grudge holders with this weird tactics in debating. The only time you reply to me is in a Dak related post. The agenda is clear and respectfully over it. That goes for Steve and 5Stars too. At some point you guys have got to be tired of derailing threads for the sake of replying to me.
But if you need more here is his standard assumption based rationalizations, lies and hypocritical justifications.


You "respectfully disagree" to something you didn't even read? lol Can't make this up. That's worth a whole chapter right there.
 
This says all you need to know about this kid.

But if you need more here is his standard assumption based rationalizations, lies and hypocritical justifications.


You "respectfully disagree" to something you didn't even read? lol Can't make this up. That's worth a whole chapter right there.
Can't say this isn't a valid point, if he was disagreeing with the post he didn't read
 
I think you mean, "12 other pro bowlers besides himself". Now you're just talking smack for the sake of being argumentative. You're taking the legitimate talking points about Dak, and trying to apply them to Romo. You're too good for that.
Like Parcells said, you have been sucked! In this case, you have been rabbit holed!
 
At some point you guys have got to be tired of derailing threads for the sake of replying to me.
Sorry, I just have to point out this gem. You say that with a straight face but completely ignore that this is what I was responding too.
That guy has done some weird tactics in debating. With me and you it’s never gone personal whether we agree or not and it’s appreciated. You have some guys not saying anyone in particular use position anonymously to their advantage and conduct themselves in a way they wouldn’t do in person. So I appreciate that if no one else has said it.
So. WHO derailed this thread? This is CLASSIC tmc and is exactly why you draw the attention you do.

You really think a random group of completely unrelated people just decided to pick on you for no reason?
 
This says all you need to know about this kid.

But if you need more here is his standard assumption based rationalizations, lies and hypocritical justifications.


You "respectfully disagree" to something you didn't even read? lol Can't make this up. That's worth a whole chapter right there.
This says all you need to know about this kid.

But if you need more here is his standard assumption based rationalizations, lies and hypocritical justifications.


You "respectfully disagree" to something you didn't even read? lol Can't make this up. That's worth a whole chapter right there.
Yep. I respectfully disagree. You’ve literally been replying the same way to me for 3 or 4 plus years now. Are you honestly gonna tell me that this post doesn't reflect the same belittling and disparaging comments that all the other posts have? This one is gonna be different lol?

You mean to tell me you aren’t gonna accuse me of gaslighting you and taking you down a rabbit hole lol?
 
Like Parcells said, you have been sucked! In this case, you have been rabbit holed!
@Runwildboys

This is why I give them replies like “respectfully disagree”. They are literally copying and pasting the same messages for the past 4 years lol. Just in case you are wondering why I wouldn’t read their tomfoolery.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,116
Messages
13,789,650
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top