Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

Those playoff records are wildly different.

In the losses, Romo made many plays. Dak made virtually none.

Not even debatable.
You see...you can't do this. You have to cite STATS. You cannot simply say "I saw plays".

You'd think these stat people wouldn't even watch games. If stats alone define players...why bother watching the games?

And so now we have ...the...human condition. The human brain has to sense things and recreate them in their brain. THEN...they have to spit it back out...without error.

Well they obviously don't HAVE to. Spit it out without error.

Most people don't care about perception error. You could literally replay it back and they'd say that's not what happened. Fight you to the death about it.
 
Sports stats are crutches for weak arguments. The less refined use them as "facts", when they're really just conditional results full of anomalies.

Look how many awful decisions franchises make based on stats. That's why most high-dollar free agents don't pan out.
 
Those playoff records are wildly different.

In the losses, Romo made many plays. Dak made virtually none.

Not even debatable.
so as I said. both stink. one stinks a little less.

that's what cowboys nation has come to....argue over which crap smells less.

and what about the Romo loss to the giants at home, with #1 seed.

yeah Giants won the superbowl, they played great, blah blah blah....doesn't change the fact he laid an egg.
against Minn, losing 34-3....he made plays? what plays?

come on dude...you are grasping at straws. you are a RomoSexual
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,149
Messages
13,792,397
Members
23,774
Latest member
Dcfiles
Back
Top