Romo enters the game anywhere near 100% we are 7-1

endersdragon

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,109
Reaction score
4,801
He leaves the game anywhere near 100% we are 7-0. Say what you will about our running attack (it's great btw) but this team right or wrong still depends largely on Romo's arm.
 
I think I agree with this premise...:huh:
 
You can play the what if game with us and actually come up with us being 5-5 or 6-4 as well. But people only play the "what if" game when it benefits you in the win column lol.

So it will be a long bye week with a win today right?
 
You can play the what if game with us and actually come up with us being 5-5 or 6-4 as well. But people only play the "what if" game when it benefits you in the win column lol.

That's what I'm saying, it's foolish to say that the Cowboys should have this or that record, because they've won some games they should have won and they won some games they should have lost. It all evens out in the end.
 
The Cowboys are exactly what their record says and that's 7-3, every team in the league can play the "what if" and "we should be this" game.

I am not playing a what if game, I accept that Romo was either playing hurt or out for 3 games. However, I am saying that when Romo plays, near 100% (week 1 he wasn't anywhere near 100%, ditto with the end of the Commanders game) we are undefeated and have several very quality victories.
 
You can play the what if game with us and actually come up with us being 5-5 or 6-4 as well. But people only play the "what if" game when it benefits you in the win column lol.

Exactly right. In Philly, they're talking about how close they are to being undefeated. Completely ignoring how close they are to having 2 or 3 more losses.
 
That's what I'm saying, it's foolish to say that the Cowboys should have this or that record, because they've won some games they should have won and they won some games they should have lost. It all evens out in the end.

When did I say "we should have this or that record"?
 
I am not playing a what if game, I accept that Romo was either playing hurt or out for 3 games. However, I am saying that when Romo plays, near 100% (week 1 he wasn't anywhere near 100%, ditto with the end of the Commanders game) we are undefeated and have several very quality victories.

He didn't do anything when he was healthy against the Commanders.
 
We have a pretty good team when romo plays. That's pretty much certain.
 
Let's use 7-3 instead.

Lol all I am saying is Romo is 7-2 and in one of those games he was playing at around 50%. Why do you have such a problem with looking at how we do when Romo is in? Every other sport in the world does that. Baseball, hockey, soccer especially do.
 
He leaves the game anywhere near 100% we are 7-0. Say what you will about our running attack (it's great btw) but this team right or wrong still depends largely on Romo's arm.

Pure BS........this offensive line and this running game is most of the reason the boys are 7-3......last time we were this good was 2007 with an oline and a running game.
 
Pure BS........this offensive line and this running game is most of the reason the boys are 7-3......last time we were this good was 2007 with an oline and a running game.

Yet the team still seems to live and die with Romo.
 
Lol all I am saying is Romo is 7-2 and in one of those games he was playing at around 50%. Why do you have such a problem with looking at how we do when Romo is in? Every other sport in the world does that. Baseball, hockey, soccer especially do.

We don't know that he was playing at 50% against the Niners, was he rusty, yes but he played and he didn't look hurt.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
466,179
Messages
13,921,240
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top