Romo = Kobe

[JBell]

As much as I hate Melo, it's a much better comparison than Kobe.

Dirk pre-ring too.

 

[CowboyStar88]

What was the huge play called back on the last drive? Don't remember that

Dez Bryant pass

 

[khiladi]

 

[Stinger_Splash]

This thread is so dumb. Romo is the anti Kobe. Kobe is a winner and is actually clutch. He leads his team to championships which means he leads his team to victories. Romo chokes all the damn time. What a stupid comparison.

 

[03EBZ06]

Another moronic post by OP, nothing to see here, move along.

 

[50cent]

My point has been proven!

 

[50cent]

His whole point is the running game and this record that Murray when he gets the ball 18 plus times Dallas is undefeated. So really he thinks that if Murray would've rushed for a 100 yards and Romo only threw for 240 they would've won the game. When in reality it wouldn't have happened. They attacked the weakness of that defense. The last few runs were pathetic 1-2 yard. Really he is missing who this team just played against and he fails to mention that they didn't punt 1 time all game and if on offense you out up 48 points you win 99 out of 100 times. If they beat the Commanders and run well he will run right back here with an I told you post. That's his MO he wants to look like he should be running this team and he is right and the rest of the NFL is wrong. He hated that game plan and he hated the fact that they came within 1 mistake of winning it. He also can't admit that Romo didn't step into his throw on that last play. He's response would be there were over 2 mins left we should run the ball. But it was 2 and 14 and they had a huge play just called back. A series of unfortunate events. But now you get some background on fity-cent. Run Run Run he doesn't believe this is a passing league and he will point to this game to say he's right when in reality this game is an anomaly and that 9 times out of 10 you when with a QB who throws for 500 yards completes 77% of his passes 5 TD's and an INT with an average of 14 yards per pass. He fails to see the other team they played against.

Still butt hurt your THEORY is dead wrong I see!! The fact of the matter people is that I don't think DALLAS is a passing team in this passing NFL game. Another fact people, I do think we should run at least 25+ times a game but could give a darn if Murray reaches 100 yards. You cant comprehend very well boss. And lastly people, the reason I don't think we are a passing team is because were too stupid of a team that always finds a way to string together A SERIES OF UNFORTUNATE EVENTS! So lets recap what I've always stressed:
1. Romo should never passes more than 30 a game (regardless of yardage or ANY/A)
2. Murray should never be gameplanned less than 20 carries and this team should run the ball no less than 25 times a game
3. Witten should avg 5-6 targets a game

Is that simple enough to understand my agenda?

 

[Doomsay]

Steak?

 

[CowboyStar88]

Still butt hurt your THEORY is dead wrong I see!! The fact of the matter people is that I don't think DALLAS is a passing team in this passing NFL game. Another fact people, I do think we should run at least 25+ times a game but could give a darn if Murray reaches 100 yards. You cant comprehend very well boss. And lastly people, the reason I don't think we are a passing team is because were too stupid of a team that always finds a way to string together A SERIES OF UNFORTUNATE EVENTS! So lets recap what I've always stressed:
1. Romo should never passes more than 30 a game (regardless of yardage or ANY/A)
2. Murray should never be gameplanned less than 20 carries and this team should run the ball no less than 25 times a game
3. Witten should avg 5-6 targets a game

Is that simple enough to understand my agenda?

No you are the one who is using an anomaly to say my theory is wrong. You are using a game that 99 out of a 100 you win. So no I'm not butt hurt you are the one not putting this game into context and using it to support your whack theory that's been proven wrong. Calling a team to stupid does not give credibility to anything you have to say. It makes you look like a child. You would be the only person who watches football to claim that they are not a passing team because they are to stupid. Yeah good way to make people take you serious. Kid grow up.

 

[TOYSTER17]

Perhaps the worst thread in CZone history. I feel tainted to have been here.

Kobe is a four letter word in my vocabulary. I'm so not interested in how many titles Stern and his league engineered for the rapist. And just so you know I was a lifetime Laker fan until around 2002.

Romo is class. Kobe is trash. I'm talking human quality here. Mods...what will it take to do a mercy killing on this thread?

What they need to do is kill your posting privilege.

 

[TOYSTER17]

there is a difference between Kobe fans and Kobetards his post was talking about the latter...the Kobe fans that comprise of the group Al-Quobe and hate any criticism whatsoever of Kobe and any Laker loss is never his fault. Just go to Lakersground for a little and you will see what i am talking about...they will ban you so fast if criticize Kobe...I remember after Lakers lost this past season James Worthy all-time Laker great was really tired of the defensive effort the Lakers were putting out on the court night after night (they would surrender like 110 a game). He criticized Kobe's effort on the defensive saying he's the leader and he should be setting the example and working hard on the defense not taking play offs to conserve energy for the offense. In Lakersground they responded by just calling him and idiot and other stuff that can't be said on this site but the one that stuck was a guy saying what does he know he has never won a title...that's a Kobetard and tbh i don't see Romotards on this site.

That site is run by great people (Larry Coon being one), just like this site here, they're not going to ban you for something silly. Now, if you go over there trolling they sure as heck will. And no, trolling doesn't mean you're criticizing Kobe.

 

[50cent]

No you are the one who is using an anomaly to say my theory is wrong. You are using a game that 99 out of a 100 you win. So no I'm not butt hurt you are the one not putting this game into context and using it to support your whack theory that's been proven wrong. Calling a team to stupid does not give credibility to anything you have to say. It makes you look like a child. You would be the only person who watches football to claim that they are not a passing team because they are to stupid. Yeah good way to make people take you serious. Kid grow up.

Like I said hes become Kobe. You bring up one game when your THEORY now has 4 losses and thats just your theory not the totality of his career losses. Why won't you discuss his CAREER games, because a case by case scenario is better for your agenda? I'm using his career games to put this in context, the more he passes the closer we get to losing.

As for the others that don't get the comparison, its simple. Kobe has 5 rings but you cant get his Stans to acknowledge that he had help winning those chips. To them Kobe wins the games (chips included) and the others lose the games no fault of Kobe. Romo has no rings but his Stans cant acknowledge that he consistently needs help in the run game to protect himself from himself or his inevitable INTs are coming. To them he wins the games or gives us the best chance to win but when it doesn't happen its the Defense, a fumble, poor blocking, no run game, coaching, lack of offensive creaativity and it never is him, even when he throws untimely INTS that lead to direct losses.

Calling them stupid isn't childish its an indictment on their propensity to always string together what you coined "a series of unfortunate events". And guess what boss, Romo is directly responsible for several of those unfortunate events over his CAREER including your anomaly game. See the big picture or refuse and drown in your THEORY!

 

[CaptainCreed]

Lol what?

Close thread please...

 

[CowboyStar88]

Like I said hes become Kobe. You bring up one game when your THEORY now has 4 losses and thats just your theory not the totality of his career losses. Why won't you discuss his CAREER games, because a case by case scenario is better for your agenda? I'm using his career games to put this in context, the more he passes the closer we get to losing.

As for the others that don't get the comparison, its simple. Kobe has 5 rings but you cant get his Stans to acknowledge that he had help winning those chips. To them Kobe wins the games (chips included) and the others lose the games no fault of Kobe. Romo has no rings but his Stans cant acknowledge that he consistently needs help in the run game to protect himself from himself or his inevitable INTs are coming. To them he wins the games or gives us the best chance to win but when it doesn't happen its the Defense, a fumble, poor blocking, no run game, coaching, lack of offensive creaativity and it never is him, even when he throws untimely INTS that lead to direct losses.

Calling them stupid isn't childish its an indictment on their propensity to always string together what you coined "a series of unfortunate events". And guess what boss, Romo is directly responsible for several of those unfortunate events over his CAREER including your anomaly game. See the big picture or refuse and drown in your THEORY!

His career games have been brought up! You are the delusional one! Wow dude done with this! Seek help or stop hitting the bottle kid. You misunderstand the stats! Wow you are unreal

 

[CowboyStar88]

Like I said hes become Kobe. You bring up one game when your THEORY now has 4 losses and thats just your theory not the totality of his career losses. Why won't you discuss his CAREER games, because a case by case scenario is better for your agenda? I'm using his career games to put this in context, the more he passes the closer we get to losing.

As for the others that don't get the comparison, its simple. Kobe has 5 rings but you cant get his Stans to acknowledge that he had help winning those chips. To them Kobe wins the games (chips included) and the others lose the games no fault of Kobe. Romo has no rings but his Stans cant acknowledge that he consistently needs help in the run game to protect himself from himself or his inevitable INTs are coming. To them he wins the games or gives us the best chance to win but when it doesn't happen its the Defense, a fumble, poor blocking, no run game, coaching, lack of offensive creaativity and it never is him, even when he throws untimely INTS that lead to direct losses.

Calling them stupid isn't childish its an indictment on their propensity to always string together what you coined "a series of unfortunate events". And guess what boss, Romo is directly responsible for several of those unfortunate events over his CAREER including your anomaly game. See the big picture or refuse and drown in your THEORY!

And again you are twisting the stats nobody said more PASSING. You keep saying that! His career stats show that when his AYPA are high he has a winning record when they are low he is not. What part if that don't you get? Stop twisting the 2. This game was an anomaly from that stand point. Damn you get hooked on one thing passing attempts when not one single person suggested that. You need to have your head examined.

 

[DFWJC]

Since when has 500 yards plus 5 TDs and a crucial INT for a L been better than a 24 point win with him throwing 240+ yards and 3 TDs?! .

Dallas would have had to score 82 (48+24) points to win on Sunday with no int.
Just saying.

And I don't know anyone here that thinks a 24 pt win is not better than a loss--even if the Qb throws for 500 and 5.

 

[50cent]

And again you are twisting the stats nobody said more PASSING. You keep saying that! His career stats show that when his AYPA are high he has a winning record when they are low he is not. What part if that don't you get? Stop twisting the 2. This game was an anomaly from that stand point. Damn you get hooked on one thing passing attempts when not one single person suggested that. You need to have your head examined.

Your AGENDA = 4 losses, MINE = 0, that must be hard for you to accept especially the week after proclaiming this was the key stat to us winning. Running the ball is the best way for this team to win and running upwards of 25+ times regardless of Romo's attempts or ANY/A. Accept it, Romo and his ANY/A foolishness is just that foolish.

 

[50cent]

Dallas would have had to score 82 (48+24) points to win on Sunday with no int.
Just saying.

And I don't know anyone here that thinks a 24 pt win is not better than a loss--even if the Qb throws for 500 and 5.

I agree and that's why I thought the game plan was flawed from the jump. Trying to out pass PM was just dumb IMO. The defense gave them 2 TOs and still gave up 51! Out passing them meant the defense would be exposed to PM wrath far too often and the offense played right into their own defenses demise. Lots will see the great quick strike offense, but wont' see they only had the ball 8 miin in the 2nd half. Someone has to make up the TOP difference and its not just the Denver offense, its the Dallas defense too. Parcell always stressed that when he was here, not tiring out his defense with too many quick strikes.

We fall victim to this often even with the Romo Madden like stats.

I disagree, I'm seeing alot of glee from the 500-5TD crowd (not just on this forum) because it somehow proves Romo (passing) is our best chance to win even though we lost.

 

[CaptainCreed]

I agree and that's why I thought the game plan was flawed from the jump. Trying to out pass PM was just dumb IMO. The defense gave them 2 TOs and still gave up 51! Out passing them meant the defense would be exposed to PM wrath far too often and the offense played right into their own defenses demise. Lots will see the great quick strike offense, but wont' see they only had the ball 8 miin in the 2nd half. Someone has to make up the TOP difference and its not just the Denver offense, its the Dallas defense too. Parcell always stressed that when he was here, not tiring out his defense with too many quick strikes.

We fall victim to this often even with the Romo Madden like stats.

I disagree, I'm seeing alot of glee from the 500-5TD crowd (not just on this forum) because it somehow proves Romo (passing) is our best chance to win even though we lost.

Agree to disagree. Our defense was not stopping their offense whether fresh or exhausted. We dominated TOP in first half and we're lucky to be down only 8. You had to out throw 18 yesterday because of how efficient their offense was and Tony almost pulled it out.

 

[VACowboy]

Your AGENDA = 4 losses, MINE = 0, that must be hard for you to accept especially the week after proclaiming this was the key stat to us winning. Running the ball is the best way for this team to win and running upwards of 25+ times regardless of Romo's attempts or ANY/A. Accept it, Romo and his ANY/A foolishness is just that foolish.

IMHO, saying X number of running plays per game leads to wins is misdiagnosing football. Sometimes you run to win. Sometimes you run because you're winning.

Philadelphia leads the league in rushing, but their record is 2-3 too. This doesn't mean that running the ball successfully can't be a key part of winning football. But it does prove that 1) there's more to winning in the NFL than running the ball a magic number of times, and 2) statistics don't tell everything.