Romo was clutch in this game!

[5Stars]

That last drive was great. Hes going to be in more situations like it moving forward and hopefully same results against the above .500 teams.

Who is "he"? You mean the team?

But, nice backhanded slam on Romo. You're going to be a big hit at the Romo bash party.

Plus, you are purty!

 

[Gemini Dolly]

Who is "he"? You mean the team?

But, nice backhanded slam on Romo. You're going to be a big hit at the Romo bash party.

Plus, you are purty!

Why you hate me so? I come in peace and love. No bash. You bully.

 

[gimmesix]

Beasley is like some little search dog that gets called by the police to go into a hostile environment to see if he can save the day!

That little runt can flat out hang with the big dogs....amazing player.

I really enjoyed how bad he made Rolle look on his last reception. His quick moves faked Rolle out of position and offbalanced to the point where Rolle just fell down when Beasley made his out cut.

 

[5Stars]

Why you hate me so? I come in peace and love. No bash. You bully.

I just love you! Is that alright?

Damn, girl.

This is about Romo...not you.

 

[percyhoward]

Outstanding pass protection on that last drive, btw.

 

[TrailBlazer]

The haters put all/most of the blame on him when we lose, so why can't he get all/most of the credit when we win ?



I think that's a fair assessment, but I'm sure you feel the same way about all the negative threads on Romo after a loss, right ?

Yes it goes both ways. I think ppl get too down on romo after a losses. I'm probably guilty of that myself. And the redundant bash romo threads are excessive. So I guess these threads are to be expected. I just expected more input from the OP when I clicked on the title.

 

[TwoDeep3]

He's taken heat for not being clutch. He's been dubbed the QB who can play really well and get the job done as long as the game isn't on the line and when it is, he chokes. Well, that was not the case for the Giants game. In fact, he came through for us in the final drive when we needed him to win. He also showed a great "heads up" ability when the ball was snapped too high and then another one that went totally over his head that he had to chase.

I think this is a generated complaint by some that want to defend Romo.

Romo led the team to a win.

There have been times he has not.

Clutch is a definition that has no real meaning.

This argument for this game is a bandaid for the wound the Romo fans carry because they feel - like Rodney Dangerfield - they, like Romo can't get no respect.

See if you can find the wrap-up on ESPN with Berman and Jackson and see how they praise him (Romo) for his game and his career.

Sticks and stones.

 

[btcutter]

Clutch?!

It's against a bad NY Giant team.
It's in November.

Let me see what other reasons I can come up with to call him a choker instead of a baller...... oh, just one playoff win and no championship.

Sarcasm....