Romo will light up the Vikings defense

Clove;3235837 said:
He helped chock the game away, not by himself but he helped.

Is it good or bad when a quarterback chocks?

Meanwhile, Favre stood up to the challenge, and by the way, he was running for his life as well.

LOL.
 
dragon_mikal;3235850 said:
Favre was hardly running for his life.

Sure, Romo didn't help...but some here are going to place the blame on him and only on him. You know it and I know it.
I'm guessing you watched a different game earlier on.
 
CowboyMcCoy;3233374 said:
I've never been wrong a when having this feeling. It started against Atlanta. Every time I post I "Romo lights up ___ defense, we win. Today is no exception. I think the Vikings secondary is too weak to match up against our receivers and TEs. And our secondary is too strong too get beat often. I think our defensive line forces Favre into making some mistakes that lead to turnovers. But the most important point is that I think Romo has a HUGE day against this secondary. The receiver to look out for, Patrick Crayton. With so much attention on RW and Miles Austin, look for Crayton to have a big day.

Go Romo!

BnA, over and out.

People and that jinx predictions.:rolleyes:
 
chuffly;3235851 said:
Is it good or bad when a quarterback chocks?
Choke, chock, however you want to spell it, doesn't change the facts.
 
chuffly;3235851 said:
Is it good or bad when a quarterback chocks?

Garrett choked. The guy is a complete moron. We could have wont his game if we had an offensive coordinator. I want that mental midget gone. This was no fault of Romo's.
 
Clove;3235837 said:
He helped chock the game away, not by himself but he helped.

Meanwhile, Favre stood up to the challenge, and by the way, he was running for his life as well.

Oh please.

You don't choke the game away when you're getting harassed all day in your back field when your offensive coordinator doesn't know how to manage a game.

Did this dumb fool not understand what Jon Fox did? Garrett is a choker.
 
Clove;3235859 said:
Choke, chock, however you want to spell it, doesn't change the facts.

The fact that no QB could succeed behind a line like that?
 
If Favre was under anywhere near the same amount of pressure that Romo was for the entire game, I guarantee the outcome of the game would have been much different.

Anyone who places the majority of the blame on Romo for this game is being shortsighted.
 
http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v22/pfjunkie/homer-doh-square.jpg
 
I don't really blame Garrett either. We lost our best lineman and after that we couldn't do a lot blocking that great line of the Vikings. When your QB isn't getting time he has no chance.
 
guag;3235870 said:
If Favre was under anywhere near the same amount of pressure that Romo was for the entire game, I guarantee the outcome of the game would have been much different.

Anyone who places the majority of the blame on Romo for this game is being shortsighted.

There is a reason Romo was under so much pressure. Garrett is a buffoon.
 
This team has shown no heart. I've been in the hospital for the past 8 weeks with my mom fighting melanoma and haven't been able to keep up as much as I'd like to but fire all these jokers. Romo played good this year, but sucked *** when it mattered the most. Garrett's playcalling? Give me a break. Phillips? Go home and coach your daughters powder puff league, because that's all that you're capable of. Newman, Jenkins, Sensabaugh? Great D you trio, you three gave up passes left and right all afternoon. BARBARION? The closest thing I see to that is a damn cat in Felix. Barbie back as normal, Brookings showing his true age. This horrible *** team was suppose to be something special and once again, changes need to be made... and I'm sorry, but I hope T.O. is laughing his *** off about these "changes" that made the Cowboys so much "better" after 44-6 loss last year, but clearly it's the same **** with a horrible team that had a capecuke schedule and didn't match up worth a damn against a real football team.
 
NickZepp;3235887 said:
I don't really blame Garrett either. We lost our best lineman and after that we couldn't do a lot blocking that great line of the Vikings. When your QB isn't getting time he has no chance.

We'd get to the 30 and Garrett was running Barber, an injured RB and even when it was apparent he wasn't cutting it, kept doing it.

GROG.
 
CowboyMcCoy;3235888 said:
There is a reason Romo was under so much pressure. Garrett is a buffoon.

It's Garrett's fault that Romo's couldn't block. Garrett did a good job this year and if Adams doesn't get hurt we probably score enough to keep the game close. Farve had all day to throw most of the game Romo didn't that's the difference in this game.
 
NickZepp;3235904 said:
It's Garrett's fault that Romo's couldn't block. Garrett did a good job this year and if Adams doesn't get hurt we probably score enough to keep the game close. Farve had all day to throw most of the game Romo didn't that's the difference in this game.

If you go back and look at the changing points in this game, it was Garrett who screwed everything up with counter-productive play calling. We were on a roll, and JG goes and screws up the momentum. Garrett is what he is: a back up quarterback who couldn't cut it as a starter and a 2nd class OC who spoiled the Cowboys season--a first class ivy league idiot.
 
He lit it up alright, there's bright yellow and purple everywhere.

I feel for the Dallas fans who paid for these tickets.
 
CowboyMcCoy;3235896 said:
We'd get to the 30 and Garrett was running Barber, an injured RB and even when it was apparent he wasn't cutting it, kept doing it.

GROG.

Everytime we got to the 30 we had a fumble lost that ended a drive, fumble that hurt a drive led to a missed FG. And a 6 yard loss to Felix that ended a drive. And made field goal. I can see blaming Garrett for one of those 3 the 6 yard loss to Felix. But our defense still gave Farve all day to throw the ball.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,944
Messages
13,906,384
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top