Rumor: Chad Johnson to the Eagles

[slick325]

I hope they traded their first...

Don't they have two 1st round picks? I think they have Carolina's right?

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Don't they have two 1st round picks? I think they have Carolina's right?

Ya, but I'd rather have them trade for Chad than Boldin..only because Philly fans want Boldin so bad

 

[Bleu Star]

Wow.... First I hear about the possibility that the Jets might steal Austin from us and now this??? Can the day get any worse? Seriously...

Joke as much as you would like to about McFlabb having another mild mannered WR to toss to but the combination of Chad Johnson and Desean Jackson receiving passes from McFlabb would be ridiculous.

 

[superpunk]

Back when Chad cared, he was intolerable for Palmer. He would go like crazy, but everytime Carson came to the sideline there was Chad in his earhole giving him a piece of his mind. It was every week, but never got the coverage of anything T.O. did becuase, well...it's Cincinnatti.

Last year, Chad got alot worse, and stopped caring completely. He just went out, went through the motions and then came back and sulked on the bench.

So Philly would be getting one of those two characters, I think. Either way, I'm not worried about it. Even if they get the talented first rendition, it's only a matter of time before McNabb orders him to shut up in the huddle.

HUGH!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgNREzBAnY4

 

[SLATEmosphere]

Wow.... First I hear about the possibility that the Jets might steal Austin from us and now this??? Can the day get any worse? Seriously...

Joke as much as you would like to about McFlabb having another mild mannered WR to toss to but the combination of Chad Johnson and Desean Jackson receiving passes from McFlabb would be ridiculous.

Ya like when our offense was going to be unstoppable with Roy,Owens and Witten

As Cowboy fans we should know first hand that whats on paper doesn't count..Until then, they will still find a way to lose.

 

[BehindEnemyLinez]

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/Could_Birds_have_interest_in_Chad_Johnson.html

Eagles may have interest in Ocho Cinco
Bengals wide receiver Chad Ocho Cinco may be getting some interest from the Eagles. Apparently everybody in Cincinnati wants to get rid of Ocho Cinco except maybe for owner Mike Brown, a key individual. The Eagles have two first-round picks and need a receiver so they could be sending one over to Cincy in exchange for the troubled receiver. Hey, the Terrell Owens Experiment in Philly seemed to work out pretty well for one season. The Birds could also be going after Bills offensive tackle Jason Peters. All this talk may be rooted in the conversation Eagles QB Donovan McNabb had with the team earlier this off-season in which he supposedly told the Eagles brass that he wouldn't sign a contract extension unless he saw the team trying to find the talent to win. (Philadelphia Inquirer)

Doesn't seem like a foregone conclusion yet, but I think Chad makes that offense pretty damn potent if they do get it done!

 

[Bleu Star]

Ya like when our offense was going to be unstoppable with Roy,Owens and Witten

As Cowboy fans we should know first hand that whats on paper doesn't count..Until then, they will still find a way to lose.

That "what's on paper" thing generally applies to our team. We're very much into announcing a Super Bowl victory before playing week one of the regular season. The Eagles haven't exhibited the same behavior...

 

[SLATEmosphere]

That "what's on paper" thing generally applies to our team. We're very much into announcing a Super Bowl victory before playing week one of the regular season. The Eagles haven't exhibited the same behavior...

LOL really??? All I hear from dumb Eagle fans is how they are going to win the superbowl with Boldin/Edwards or Chad..it's pretty annoying.

I'm going to assume they are the same Eagle team with Mcflub being his typical inconsistant self and Chad gets hurt. They have to prove me wrong otherwise. I still wouldn't be scared of them with Chad.

 

[Rampage]

Ya like when our offense was going to be unstoppable with Roy,Owens and Witten

As Cowboy fans we should know first hand that whats on paper doesn't count..Until then, they will still find a way to lose.

well McNabb is a much better qb than Romo though.

But you're right they probably will still find a way to lose.

 

[Woods]

well McNabb is a much better qb than Romo though.

But you're right they probably will still find a way to lose.

This assumes that McNabb stays healthy for the year as well.

Last year may have been the abberation.

 

[5Stars]

well McNabb is a much better qb than Romo though.

But you're right they probably will still find a way to lose.

That is your opinion, cool?

How long has McChoke been a starter? How long has Romo been a starter?

And my opnion is that Romo will prove to be better by the time he spends playing as much as McPuke. But, keep dogging Romo...no big deal.

 

[Rampage]

That is your opinion, cool?

How long has McChoke been a starter? How long has Romo been a starter?

And my opnion is that Romo will prove to be better by the time he spends playing as much as McPuke. But, keep dogging Romo...no big deal.

i'm not dogging Romo. McNabb is a very good qb but gets dismissed on this site cause he hasn't won a superbowl. Mcnabb has never and will never have the weapons Tony has. you can be a homer all you want but McNabb is the better qb.

 

[Dhragon]

i'm not dogging Romo. McNabb is a very good qb but gets dismissed on this site cause he hasn't won a superbowl. Mcnabb has never and will never have the weapons Tony has. you can be a homer all you want but McNabb is the better qb.

There's not a big enough gap between Romo and McNabb to declare anyone who suggests Romo might be better than McNabb a Homer. Now if they suggested he was better than Peyton Manning or Tom Brady, then you can throw the Homer tag in there, but for McNabb. I don't think so.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

There's not a big enough gap between Romo and McNabb to declare anyone who suggests Romo might be better than McNabb a Homer. Now if they suggested he was better than Peyton Manning or Tom Brady, then you can throw the Homer tag in there, but for McNabb. I don't think so.

Pffffffftt........

When Tony Wins a playoff game , then you can say that the gap has shrunk a bit from Tony and McFlubb. #5 won with Fred-Ex... Tony couldn't with 3 All Pros catching the ball.

Being called a homer for disregarding those facts are warranted.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

well McNabb is a much better qb than Romo though.

But you're right they probably will still find a way to lose.

silly New Yorker

 

[Bob Sacamano]

i'm not dogging Romo. McNabb is a very good qb but gets dismissed on this site cause he hasn't won a superbowl. Mcnabb has never and will never have the weapons Tony has. you can be a homer all you want but McNabb is the better qb.

McNabb's best seasons came with TO

 

[Randy White]

well McNabb is a much better qb than Romo though.
.

Not for the last 41 games, he hasn't.

As a matter of fact, nobody in the NFC East has been better than Romo since Romo started his first game.

Nobody.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

I'd still take Romo over Mcflab and I'm not being a homer..

I swear..

 

[Rampage]

McNabb's best seasons came with TO

Owens was only with him for 1 season. he helped get his team to 3 straight nfc champiomships before Owens got there and won the 4th won without me-o. everything is not about stats.

Not for the last 41 games, he hasn't.

As a matter of fact, nobody in the NFC East has been better than Romo since Romo started his first game.

Nobody.

does that count playoff games? once again everything is not about passer rating and individual stats.

 

[Randy White]

Tony Romo:
41 career games as a starter ( including playoffs ):
27 wins, 14 losses
10,563 yards, 63.6 % completion, 83 TDs, 47 ints.

The closest QB in the NFC East to those numbers over the last 41 games ( including playoffs and SB ) as a starter is Eli Manning:

Eli Manning
27 wins, 14 losses
8,215 yards, 55.9% completion, 54 TDs, 36 ints


McNabb is a DISTANT third..