RustyBourneHorse
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 42,471
- Reaction score
- 49,214
I wouldn't hate it one bit. I too would prefer something beside OL at 12 but I understand that it is absolutely a possibility to happen depending on how the board falls. I think we need to get our dominate OL back to help the run game and the offense as a whole. But I also think we may have the guys in house already. If Guyton takes the step up I feel confident that between Beebe, Hoffman, Richards and Thomas we have C and RG at least solid, at worst.
So saying that, I don't know how your board fell when you made this mock, but I'd be tempted to take either a DE or a WR at 12 and take OL later.
Exactly, and, if we want to run the ball, then oline round 1 can be helpful. Unfortunately, McMillan was gone and it was a bit early to go Williams (though I might do that on a later no trade mock). Oh, and Jeanty was gone (plus, I like Kaleb Johnson a lot too). So, in that case, I figured, especially with Martin being gone, when in doubt, go oline and I like Booker. Especially since it then means Guyton, Smith, Beebe, Booker, and Steele. That's a much better oline.