alancdc
Active Member
- Messages
- 3,295
- Reaction score
- 5
Bleu Star;2709620 said:I am too.
....and his wife is really good lookin! Class acts both of em.
Bleu Star;2709620 said:I am too.
BraveHeartFan;2710482 said:He's a good man for handling it properly, because not everyone would have remained as civil as he did, and he's an even better person for accepting an appology, which probably isn't a true one in the first place, and just getting on with his life.
he's not spending a lot of wasted time, and energy, on hate or anger with the situation. That's the mark of a really good person.
I tip my hat to Mr. Moats.
BraveHeartFan;2710482 said:He's a good man for handling it properly, because not everyone would have remained as civil as he did, and he's an even better person for accepting an appology, which probably isn't a true one in the first place, and just getting on with his life.
he's not spending a lot of wasted time, and energy, on hate or anger with the situation. That's the mark of a really good person.
I tip my hat to Mr. Moats.
ConcordCowboy;2710613 said:Yeah nice apology through his lawyers (who wrote it no doubt)...after his *** and job were on the line.
I wouldn't accept an apology through a lawyer.
GimmeTheBall!;2710781 said:The Moats' graciousness and generosity is a thing to behold.
However . . . by being this gracious, I wonder if the Moats are being enablers to this officer's zealousness in "protecting" the public.
I had given the officer the benefit of the doubt, because in instances like this, the officer has to be skeptical and careful.
But when Zach Thomas let it be known that his wife, too, was a victim of this officer's aggressiveness, I began to think Powell was one of those officers who happens to be a recurring bully.
Again, the Moats have turned the other cheek, but maybe it's time the victims and the department put the boot to Powell's career as an officer. At least reassign him for good to a desk where he can't hurt others.
links18;2710801 said:Not sure why it is so obligatory to accept the apology of a bully issued through his legal mouthpiece. The officer's conduct, while probably legal, was completely unprofessional. This isn't some dude with whom he had a disagreement at the bar. This was an armed officer of the state. They need to be held to a higher standard for the public's sake.
JerryAdvocate;2709803 said:I don't think you suck, I'm just saying you wouldn't provoke an armed man
For the police out there, I am confused...........Is it legal to shoot a suspect who isnt armed in the back while running away? I thought it wasn't, but I keep seeing reference to Moats possibly getting shot unarmed.Dhragon;2710478 said:Remember, it was Moat's Mother-in-Law NOT his mother. So I extremely doubt he was willing to take a chance at being shot to go to her side unlike if it was his own mother (I realize some mother-in-laws are better than some mothers, but most just aren't as beloved by the son-in-law as their own mothers). We really don't know how close Moats was to his wife's mother. He might of even hated her for all we know.
Now Moat's wife apparently DID risk being shot and ran to her mother's side and was there when she died. She is the person who the officer really, really owes the apology to (though regardless, he should still be fired).
dogunwo;2711664 said:For the police out there, I am confused...........Is it legal to shoot a suspect who isnt armed in the back while running away? I thought it wasn't, but I keep seeing reference to Moats possibly getting shot unarmed.
dogunwo;2711664 said:For the police out there, I am confused...........Is it legal to shoot a suspect who isnt armed in the back while running away? I thought it wasn't, but I keep seeing reference to Moats possibly getting shot unarmed.