Deep_South
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,030
- Reaction score
- 3,653
Green Bay had 400 yards passing against the Eagles tonight and Aaron Rogers didn't play.
You buddy are an Eagle's fan. See right thru you bro. Take your Eagle-jock-riding, less than half of a playbook claimin fan boy *** outta here with that.
Seems like 'ol "Rogah" got everyone jumpy. Got peeps thinkin' there may be more infiltrators.
Green Bay had 400 yards passing against the Eagles tonight and Aaron Rogers didn't play.
The Eagles starters sure didn't do that. In fact, they looked pretty good outside of two plays with some missed tackles. I know perspective really is a downer for some arguments around here but it should be at least thought about taken into consideration when attempting to talk like you know what you're talking about.
The Eagles starters sure didn't do that. In fact, they looked pretty good outside of two plays with some missed tackles. I know perspective really is a downer for some arguments around here but it should be at least thought about taken into consideration when attempting to talk like you know what you're talking about.
You seem to be arguing against things I didn't say or even allude to, so let's start over. I said the Eagles gave up 400 yards passing and Aaron Rogers didn't play. What specifically do you find wrong or misleading about that statement?
The Eagkes are the second best team in the NFCE on paper. Their fans have some reason for excitement. But preseason w/l records or scores have nothing to do with them.
Either way, they're still looking up at the Cowboys. Hope they enjoy the view.
I didn't realize he was such an Eagles homer.
I can't recall a single team that dominated in preseason like that and did well when the regular season came around. Spurrier comes to mind.
The Eagkes are the second best team in the NFCE on paper. Their fans have some reason for excitement. But preseason w/l records or scores have nothing to do with them.
Either way, they're still looking up at the Cowboys. Hope they enjoy the view.
There's an analogy I like to use for the Eagles under Chip. I'm a big MMA and boxing fan, and oftentimes there will be fighters coming up through the ranks who I refer to as "can crushers". These are the guys who are very good at beating the guys that they're supposed to beat, and they usually do it in impressive fashion. Put them in the ring with a guy that's not quite on their level, and you're sure to see a dominant KO/TKO/submission win, probably in the 1st or 2nd round. Put them in the ring with a legit, top 5 contender, and they fold. These "can crushers" arent necessarily bad fighters. In fact, it's quite the opposite, however they'll never be champ and usually end up a fringe top ten fighter who makes a career out of being a gate-keeper. Guys who are for real beat them.
If there was ever an NFL version of a "can crusher", it's Chip's Eagles. They'll squash bad teams. But when a "real" team drags them into deep waters, they'll drown more times than not.