Galian Beast
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 7,457
Don't most big money contracts contain unrealistic back end salaries?
All players and agents are concerned with is how much up front guaranteed money is on the table.
Miami signed Mike Wallace last year to a 5 year, $60M deal with $27M guaranteed, including an $11M signing bonus.
His 2013 cap hit was only $3.25M.
The biggest initial signing bonus I've seen to a WR was the $16M Detroit paid to Calvin Johnson.
Dez Bryant, who dropped a team leading 12 passes last year, isn't Megatron.
I expect Dallas will sign Dez to a 7 year extension to enable future restructures or they will add years in the future to allow it (the player doesn't care).
How about $35M guaranteed? It would include the new signing bonus and the base salaries in '14, '15 and '16.
Let's say Bryant receives a $12M signing bonus (that's $1M more than Wallace), it will prorate $2.4M per season whether the deal is 5 years or 7 years.
When Dez signs, his 2014 base salary ($1.78M) will be lowed to the fourth year minimum ($0.73K) with the difference ($1.05M) being included in the new signing bonus.
Bryant's new 2014 cap number would be $4.2485M.
That would represent an increase of only $1.1M over his current '14 cap number ($3.1485M).
The Cowboys would be able to do the same thing in 2015 and 2016 to keep Bryant's contract cap friendly.
Even if you want to give Bryant a bigger initial signing bonus, it will not be a huge increase versus his current cap number.
He just doesn't get it...