This can't be for real. This is sacarasm... I hope
I mean let's get real he can't be worse than Weeden.
He played some QB at some point I think idk or threw a ball once i think.
Coaches are idiots if they think Weeden is a better QB than DMC.
If this is a serious question, here's my answer: Going from playing QB once somewhere other than the NFL to playing in the NFL is like going from playing the board game operation to be a real surgeon in a hospital.
I was thinking we should start Leary at QB, if his injury is better. Collins did well at LG in his absence, and Leary is a stud, definitely top 11 offensive player, so he should be on the field. Either at QB or WR.
Garrett's a QB......and Santa has been delivering football's for generations with zero INTs.
And he drives a sleigh, which has to be tougher than driving a bus (which Weeden can't even do).
I like where your head is. Saint Nick for Cowboys QB.
What about inanimate carbon rod at QB?
Meh I think he can do it.
He's definitely better than Weeden IMO.
Really? So let me get this straight: You want to give Darren McFadden a shot to take Weeden place even before we have a look at the backup QB's namely Matt Cassel who has more NFL starts than Weeden does? Is that what you are saying?
Did you watch the game? Weeden did fine. Who do you want? Aaron Rodgers?Hey, whatever gets Weedumb out of here.
Yeah.
My list of who I want to see at QB this week is as follows:
1.) Santa Clause (seven made great points on him).
2.) DMC (seen him throw a ball a time or two)
3.) Leary (idk prob athletic enough)
4.) Vince Papale (always defies the odds)
1,200,948.) Brandon Weeden
the coaches just don't know yet that all these guys are superior to weeden. they gon' learn today.