Sevenup3000
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 874
- Reaction score
- 923
Remember when this idiotic board thought that the Eagles would be better off with Wentz than Hurts?
I remember when one guy in particular did.Remember when this idiotic board thought that the Eagles would be better off with Wentz than Hurts?
ExactlyWho cares? The Cowboys went 5-11 for three straight seasons with nothing to show for it. Give me a Lombardi and three straight 5 win seasons. Where do I sign up?
Not like this time.We’ve been in this prophesized salary cap hell since 2015
I’d rather win 3 or more Super Bowls in a row.So would you rather win 1 Super Bowl in 10 years, even if you only win 5 games for 5 seasons after the title, or make the playoffs 10 straight years and be eliminated?
Me? I'd sacrifice five seasons to win a Super Bowl.
Yes. The goal is to win it all. How many teams have done this? You absolutely sell the future if it means you win it right now. This is what the Eagles did and they cashed in for 2017 season and now are halfway to another title. Who cares about draft picks if you get proven players who can produce right now. And if you see a player in the draft you really want and thinks can help mold you, yes you go for it and mortgage future draft picks.Exactly
This one isn’t close to as bad as 2016. We dumped Demarco Murray, Byron Maxwell, Kiko Alonso, Sam Bradford monster contracts after only 1 year. We traded Sam Bradford THE SAME OFFSEASON we gave him a big extension. Just took the full cap hit. Rebuilt the entire defense in 1 offseason with no moneyNot like this time.
How does Minnesota feel after this game? Lmao. They let this loser team come into their home and look like a legit team to the point where people really thought they could beat Philly and that Daniel Jones was a good QBImagine going into a divisional game thinking you can win with Richie James and Darius Slayton as your WRs.
Ok let us all know when that starts …..been a long 27 yearsI’d rather win 3 or more Super Bowls in a row.
well saidYes. The goal is to win it all. How many teams have done this? You absolutely sell the future if it means you win it right now. This is what the Eagles did and they cashed in for 2017 season and now are halfway to another title. Who cares about draft picks if you get proven players who can produce right now. And if you see a player in the draft you really want and thinks can help mold you, yes you go for it and mortgage future draft picks.
Only loser franchises care about draft picks. Winning franchises use these as collateral to get proven players right now
Hey, the Eagles puke is here.This one isn’t close to as bad as 2016. We dumped Demarco Murray, Byron Maxwell, Kiko Alonso, Sam Bradford monster contracts after only 1 year. We traded Sam Bradford THE SAME OFFSEASON we gave him a big extension. Just took the full cap hit. Rebuilt the entire defense in 1 offseason with no money
2023 will be elementary cap management for Howie compared to that
That would work if I wasn’t also always here after losses.Hey, the Eagles puke is here.
I guess I know who won.
Those were not all-in years. They were somewhat in years. All in fixes your holes. We still had major holes when we acquired those players.You said it. Going all in does not guarantee a title. I’ve seen the Cowboys go all in with Roy Williams, Joey Galloway, Terrell Owen and Amari Cooper and they paid the price.
Stay tuned.Ok let us all know when that starts …..been a long 27 years
That's a cop-out. Everyone would rather win 3 or more Super Bowls in a row. Show me the teams that have done it because there haven't been many, especially in the salary cap age, and then show me how to do it.I’d rather win 3 or more Super Bowls in a row.
Trading multiple first round picks is going all in.Those were not all-in years. They were somewhat in years. All in fixes your holes. We still had major holes when we acquired those players.
Making expensive additions when you don't have a team built that can go far is a bad idea unless you make enough expensive additions to put you over the top.
The Terrell Owens signing was probably the closest to matching that criteria because we had a pretty strong team overall. But imagine if we had gotten a better third receiver than Patrick Crayton at the trade deadline or had just picked up a better cornerback that Jacques Reeves. That 2007 playoff game might have turned out differently.
Like the Chiefs and the Bills and the Eagles and the 9ers and the Rams do?Trading multiple first round picks is going all in.
It's also much easier to rebuild now, so you can sell out and still get back in the mix within a couple of seasons. Sustained success is difficult anyway because of free agency.Yes. The goal is to win it all. How many teams have done this? You absolutely sell the future if it means you win it right now. This is what the Eagles did and they cashed in for 2017 season and now are halfway to another title. Who cares about draft picks if you get proven players who can produce right now. And if you see a player in the draft you really want and thinks can help mold you, yes you go for it and mortgage future draft picks.
Only loser franchises care about draft picks. Winning franchises use these as collateral to get proven players right now