Say what you want but Romo

Parcells just said in his PC that on that Bledsoe INT at the Goal line when we could've gone up 14 12, Bledsoe did what he wanted to do. The design of the play apparently should've gone to TO, and Bledsoe improvised.
 
Clove;1110501 said:
That's exactly how you build. You start with the QB. Then you install that great OLine and go from there.

You can't win anything w/out a QB. Let's see if we have one in Romo. If he isn't the answer...... let's plan accordingly.

Let's get this thorn in our side behind us.
 
Clove;1110536 said:
Parcells just said in his PC that on that Bledsoe INT at the Goal line when we could've gone up 14 12, Bledsoe did what he wanted to do. The design of the play apparently should've gone to TO, and Bledsoe improvised.

oooooooh

now it's personal
 
Clove;1110536 said:
Parcells just said in his PC that on that Bledsoe INT at the Goal line when we could've gone up 14 12, Bledsoe did what he wanted to do. The design of the play apparently should've gone to TO, and Bledsoe improvised.
yup.. he went to terry glenn instead.
 
RCowboyFan;1110226 said:
Yep, we do need to find out, and I was afraid to find out. I just hope my fears don't come true. And we are not trying to trade up in next year's draft to draft QB, after passing up chances to take a QB, because Bill Parcells the genious thought he could find diamond in a rough much like Jerry Jones.

If they play like they did tonight, they won't need to trade up. ;)
 
I am very pleased that so many fans see this as I do...

lets find out what we have with Romo and than go from there...I mean really... Romo played just as good as our 14 year vet
 
Cbz40;1110555 said:
You can't win anything w/out a QB. Let's see if we have one in Romo. If he isn't the answer...... let's plan accordingly.

Let's get this thorn in our side behind us.

cbz, did you take your heart med and polish off the gin as well ?
 
kingwhicker;1110563 said:
If they play like they did tonight, they won't need to trade up. ;)

bwahahaha:lmao2:but at least we will know something
 
Hoov;1110581 said:
cbz, did you take your heart med and polish off the gin as well ?

I broke open the heart medicine (Whiskey) in the 1st quarter.........the fibulator (Gin) when Bledsoe threw the INT. Then I shot the dog......just kidding:D
 
I don't understand the Romo haters.

We gave Quincy freakin' Carter 30+ games yet you guys dont want to give Romo another game.
 
Ijust can't stand to watch Bledsoe anymore. Anyone notice that as soon as Bledsoe went out Whitten was all of a sudden part of the game plan? That's no coincidence boys and girls. When he doesn't have to srtay in for max protection he can actually run a route and a productive player. Romo's ability to make ONE STEP to elude a rush is light years ahead of where we are with Bledsoe.

SS

:star:
 
We stunk with Q Carter and he probably was the best we had. We didn't have good teams those years. This year we have a good team with Bledsoe if our defense can play well. Tonight the D didn't play well. I think Bledsoe may have given us a better chance to win.
 
Cbz40;1110625 said:
I broke open the heart medicine (Whiskey) in the 1st quarter.........the fibulator (Gin) when Bledsoe threw the INT. Then I shot the dog......just kidding:D

LOL, well parcells was right about one thing, the fans who came out tonight deserved to see better football than what we saw.

im actually glad i abstained tonight, id be extra cranky after that game if id been drinking.
 
NickZepp;1110694 said:
We stunk with Q Carter and he probably was the best we had. We didn't have good teams those years. This year we have a good team with Bledsoe if our defense can play well. Tonight the D didn't play well. I think Bledsoe may have given us a better chance to win.
What good team are you referring too. I've not seen a good team from Dallas since last year with the Mavs.
 
NickZepp;1110694 said:
We stunk with Q Carter and he probably was the best we had. We didn't have good teams those years. This year we have a good team with Bledsoe if our defense can play well. Tonight the D didn't play well. I think Bledsoe may have given us a better chance to win.

Bledsoe put us in the hole. We cant keep expecting the defense to bail us out every game, that only works against bad teams. Those players get demoralized after the O makes mistakes and squanders opportunities. even after all the mistakes the defense still gave us a shot to go up before halftime, how can you ask more.
 
NickZepp;1110694 said:
We stunk with Q Carter and he probably was the best we had. We didn't have good teams those years. This year we have a good team with Bledsoe if our defense can play well. Tonight the D didn't play well. I think Bledsoe may have given us a better chance to win.

I supported Bledose hard all last year but he's been a disaster this year. Even when he's had time, at times he has acted like he's had no time.

Screw it, bring on Romo.8 INTs in 6 games from a 14 year veteran isn't going to get any better.
 
Hoov;1110699 said:
LOL, well parcells was right about one thing, the fans who came out tonight deserved to see better football than what we saw.

im actually glad i abstained tonight, id be extra cranky after that game if id been drinking.

I stayed w/the DrPepper.....it's a good thing. I would probably have thrown something at my big screen.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,264
Messages
13,862,006
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top