- Messages
- 78,729
- Reaction score
- 43,189
Really has aged badly IMO.
Although it was/is a great film, I imagine it is more so for people over a certain age that enjoyed it when it came out.
I also think the first godfather has not aged as well...however the second one has aged well IMO because they go back to another time and it actually looks better than the stuff set in the 70s.
I could easily see a 20 year old watching it and seeing how dated it is and thinking it is just hard to watch.
With that said...it is very hard to remake a classic and have it even come close to the impact or quality of the original.
It is much easier for lesser known films to be remade and done better.
A good deal of the action or drama films made in the 70's and set in the 70's just don't seem to age as well IMO.
Think about the dirty harry movies...Loved them years ago...try to watch them now and it is hard for me. However you put on a Clint Eastwood western and I am good to go.
Although it was/is a great film, I imagine it is more so for people over a certain age that enjoyed it when it came out.
I also think the first godfather has not aged as well...however the second one has aged well IMO because they go back to another time and it actually looks better than the stuff set in the 70s.
I could easily see a 20 year old watching it and seeing how dated it is and thinking it is just hard to watch.
With that said...it is very hard to remake a classic and have it even come close to the impact or quality of the original.
It is much easier for lesser known films to be remade and done better.
A good deal of the action or drama films made in the 70's and set in the 70's just don't seem to age as well IMO.
Think about the dirty harry movies...Loved them years ago...try to watch them now and it is hard for me. However you put on a Clint Eastwood western and I am good to go.