Beaker42
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,351
- Reaction score
- 8,299
Really? I’m more surprised we don’t line up a TE at every receiver spot.Makes sense. Thought they may bring up Lenoir. Another WR instead of a rarely used TE.
Really? I’m more surprised we don’t line up a TE at every receiver spot.Makes sense. Thought they may bring up Lenoir. Another WR instead of a rarely used TE.
Perfect. I think this is more an indictment of our WRs.
They need that extra receiver as Austin is out. Have more options for Dak to throw to I guess.
Pretty much are now.Really? I’m more surprised we don’t line up a TE at every receiver spot.

That's one way to surprise the Commanders.Schultz active for first time this season
He's your coach...lol...A new process?If you have four TEs, you don’t really have any TEs.
Seriously, though, why have four TEs active?
One problem - he knows nuhhhh-thing.That's one way to surprise the Commanders.
How will they ever hope to overcome that?
Yeah,he’s looked like another Escobar.Yeah I was thinking it's time for Schultz to be active but at the expense of the all world Blake Jarwin. He shouldn't even be on the roster at this point.
Garrett would run a 4 te formation before a four wr formation. Don't count him out. Remember when Escobar was featured out of the spread offense? Lol. We'd rather sell groceries then win games with real receivers. If Gathers isn't the Answer then we have no Answer because none of the tes can run the seam route that 82 could This coaching staff is inept. I can't wait for a non te biased coach to land on this team. It's totally Embarrassing who and how we line up in the skilled positions every week. Same inept tes trying to be Gronk and getting the snaps but never the yards or score any points.If you have four TEs, you don’t really have any TEs.
Seriously, though, why have four TEs active?
