CowboysExchange
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,349
- Reaction score
- 557
They still lost Jarwin who was a starter also. The developing te youre talking about prolly won't even be the #2 starting te this year.lol, and you tried to say I got offended ….
As for semantics, the entire weight of your argument was based on the claim Schultz has a contract that falls within the top 5 of current TE contracts. That weight crumbles with the reality he doesn't have a contract remotely like the top 5.
Signing a tag for one year and one year only, and being forced to in order to get paid at all, is nothing like a top 5 contract. The difference is night and day - miles apart - not just semantics.
And, again, you can't even say why it's a bad deal. The closest you have come is to say using the tag on Schultz was a poor use of resources, but how is that the case when they had no plan to use that resource on any other player, so it wouldn't have been used at all otherwise?
The Cowboys had the tag to use ….
they weren't going to use it on anyone else …
they have the cap space and there is no future or ongoing cap implication ...
they avoided being left without a proven TE option in 2022 ...
they bought time for the rookie TE to develop ....
So where is the harm? How was the team damaged?
We still have no bonafide replacement for Jarwin much less Schultzkowski. Lol
That's a loss right there.
Spending all that cash on a weak checkdown safety valve te that can't jump to cut Cooper and Wilson was a ignorant loss also.
There's too many rookie culda woulda shouldas w no black n white stats.
We haven't had a starting rookie te in 2 decades bruh???
Last edited: