Lee should be brought back with $1 million base salary and easy incentive to make it to $ 3 million. Other incentives for if he plays well, makes pro bowl etc. Yes, he needs to be a backup but his leadership skills and as a sideline coach for the young guys will be invaluable.
LBs always get nicked up and having Lee as quality backup or rotating in for a series each half will only preserve the young guns for a long season.
Maybe we'll see that in base formations. I like the idea of Smith at SOLB,. Could be a Bruce Irvin clone in blitzing.
Lee at WOLB, LVE at ILB and Smith at SOLB. Then Smith and LVE in the nickel.
I didn't realize he did not play well. In fact Im pretty confident that he did play well when he was healthy. Sean has the same concerns as he has had from day 1.......injuries. May be the reason he is not on the roster next season.
We could mainly play a big nickel, with Smith acting like an in the box SS over the TE, and Lee and LVE at WOLB and ILB. Bring in a corner and take out Heath at SS. That's our best set of players, if Lee is healthy again. We're weak at SS anyway.
The only game I remember him playing bad in was the Rams. But LVE and Smith bad as well in that game.Go back and watch the game he played in. Except for really short stints he played really bad last year. He was a liability when he played most of the time. It was crazy how badly he played because I was no expecting to see that from him.
Well it's a good thing the Cowboys aren't run by wannabe know it all loser fans or we'd be in trouble lmao.If it were strictly up to me, I'd be real tempted to sincerely apologize to Lee before sending him packing.
However, with Jerry being both a fan and a soft touch for his players, he might well see fit to retain him.
Yeah you're a moron. Acting like he played terribly. lmao.Go back and watch the game he played in. Except for really short stints he played really bad last year. He was a liability when he played most of the time. It was crazy how badly he played because I was no expecting to see that from him.
What is Sean Lee NOW? Is he the stud player that didn't play well because of some odd reason last year and who will rebound in a big way in 2019 or is he done?
That's a huge question that the Cowboys need to get right. I think there is more risk to the Cowboys in assuming that he will rebound than to assume he won't.
If we assume he won't, someone who needs linebacker help will probably be willing to take a risk on him and give us something in return for him. If he rebounds it doesn't really matter because he shouldn't get any real PT this year here unless Jaylon or LVE is injured.
If we keep him and pay him, and he doesn't play well, it costs us his cap hit AND more importantly it costs us quality play needed in a back up role.
I don't know what the correct play is on this one, as it could go either way, but I hope the team gets it right. I would err toward the pick. But if he stays there is no way he is seeing his full salary this year if I'm Jerry.
Lee is a serious liability in the passing game. He couldn't play nickel effectively. Teams were scheming plays at him in the passing game. That's never been the case.
The only realistic options seem to be pay cut or release. His 7M salary is too much for a backup.
Even if the 3 LBs in the base became Lee, Vander Esch and Jaylon, the SLB only plays about 30% or less of the snaps.
Note: Lee would likely play WLB in base with either Vander Esch or Jaylon playing SLB. Then the 2 starting LBs in Nickel would be Vander Esch and Jaylon.
If Lee is reasonably healthy,even at his current age, the trio of Lee, Vander Esch and Jaylon is an upgrade over Wilson, Vander Esch and Jaylon.
At a reduced cost or playing time incentive type contract, Lee would be good to have on the roster. If he plays a few snaps every game he has a chance to stay healthy which gives the team an above average or better backup in the event of an injury to Vander Esch or Jaylon.
Past Scenario:
In the past they paid him with the hope that he would play 100% of the LB snaps. He played regardless of whether there were 3 LBs (base), 2 LBs (Nickel) or 1 LB (Dime).
Future Scenario:
Now they would be planning for him to play about 20% of the LB snaps and then bump up to 80% if Vander Esch or Jaylon were out for a complete game.
The probability of him staying healthy in the "Future Scenario" is much higher than the probability of him staying healthy in the "Past Scenario".
Yeah you're a moron. Acting like he played terribly. lmao.
I'll agree that he looked "off" for much of the season, but he looked better than the other 2 LBs in the Rams game to me.You obviously didn't watch the games or don't have any idea what you are watching.