Seattle - 20 vs Green Bay - 42 **Game Thread**

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
That reminds me of last week when Collins 'fumbled' the ball, until Gibbs challenged it, and they decided not to review it and say it wasn't a fumble. What a royal screw up that was.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Seattle looks good. Good QB, decent O-line, D-line, linebackers, corners. They're peaking at the right time.
 

TD22

Active Member
Messages
440
Reaction score
176
Our Cowboys should be watching and learning on how not to start a game......
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
theogt;1894267 said:
Seattle looks good. Good QB, decent O-line, D-line, linebackers, corners. They're peaking at the right time.

They are a good team. Not sure why they get no respect. The only person I ever hated on that team was Jeremy Stevens, and now that they sent him packing, I can actually respect them. Except for the jerk that gave us the new ball, of course.
 

MetalHead

Benched
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
2
TD22;1894269 said:
Our Cowboys should be watching and learning on how not to start a game......

We already know that,did you forget the 1994 NFC Championship game?
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
Yeagermeister;1894272 said:
By ruling a td it was ruled a force out.

No. Remember when TO got the catch against (I think it was the Patriots)? He didn't get both feet in, but he was obviously forced out. However, the referee thought that he had both feet in, and thus did not find a need in calling a "force out". However, when they reviewed it, he didn't have both feet in, and because they did not initially call it a force out, it went incomplete.

There's the flaw in the system right there.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
DragonCowboy;1894282 said:
No. Remember when TO got the catch against (I think it was the Patriots)? He didn't get both feet in, but he was obviously forced out. However, the referee thought that he had both feet in, and thus did not find a need in calling a "force out". However, when they reviewed it, he didn't have both feet in, and because they did not initially call it a force out, it went incomplete.

There's the flaw in the system right there.

I have given up trying to understand some of the rules. :eek::
 
Top