- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
Your failure to articulate why you think what you think is not very convincing.
I'd argue that. I'd say it's a fairly convincing failure, as failures go.
Your failure to articulate why you think what you think is not very convincing.
Your failure to articulate why you think what you think is not very convincing.
Yea, it's well known that 3-4 defenses have more trouble with the run. Ask any defensive coordinator.
Yea, it's well known that 3-4 defenses have more trouble with the run. Ask any defensive coordinator.
You know Amber I'd love for you to support one of your many "clichés" with some hard data... At some point...
See post #22
Gotta say that's no data-proof of the statement that a 3-4 defense is inherently worse vs the run as compared to a 4-3.
It's the same as saying the sun is hot. It's a well known fact. Sorry that you don't know this. We're all ignorant in somethings.
In order to be successful with the 3-4 you have to have the right personnel at various positions. To effectively stop the run, a team must have a dominant nose tackle capable of occupying space and taking on several blockers at once. DE's are not only expected to have the speed to rush the QB on passing downs, but also to have the strength and size necessary to take on offensive linemen and keep them off the inside LB's on running plays. Outside LB's need to be incredible athletes with a non-stop motor and a great nose for the ball, i.e. Clay Matthews of the Packers. These guys are not easy to find and if any of those positions has a weakness the 3-4 will be very weak against the run.
I think those stats would be hard to find. Not sure if any outfit keeps track of such things.
David Moore @DavidMooreDMN 45m
DE Anthony Spencer said he will play this Sunday against KC but won't start as he plays his way back into shape. George Selvie starts again.
Yea, it's well known that 3-4 defenses have more trouble with the run. Ask any defensive coordinator.
There is no such thing as absolute truth when making qualitative statements such as 'have more trouble." It's a gross generalization to begin with and calling it a fact does not make it one. YOu do all of the bush league argumentation methods like flippantly fronting as if it is a universal truth and invoking the support of people you do not even produce.
Essentially all you have attempted to show is that it is more difficult to find the players to execute the assignments. I could just as easily say that quality 3 techniques and strongside pass rushing ends who can also defend the run are difficult to find. Certainly more difficult to find than a 325 lbs slug to clog the A gaps or an OLB that can defend the run. It'
That is besides the point though. Making the assumption that the assignments can be carried out, 3-4 defenders will be in a better position to defend the run. Charging into the backfield leaves lanes especially from certain angles as well as make you susceptible to being trapped behind the line.
Bottomline though, there is no certainty as to which defense is the 'best' or which one has 'more problems.' Playing fantasy land about people with an authoritative position that supposedly agree with you does not help either.
Nice having Selvie around so Spence can work back into the mix.
Anyone who thinks that Selvie (at this stage of the game) is even equal to Spencer needs to tap the brakes.
Spencer has proven to be one of the top players vs the run and he's a decent pass rusher.
Selvie MAY prove to be an adequate substitute but up to this point of his career he's done little to merit being compared favorably to Spencer.
Not being able to find them does not suddenly make your assertion true. It just means you cannot prove it. Also how hard is it to determine which teams run a 3-4 and see how they rank?
But hey why bother when you can just front like it's true and hope people buy it.