ejthedj;3036176 said:The one major change that needs to be made at this point...
Watkins has looked good when playing, on st, and in preseason.
To paraphrase Kinky Friedman, he CAN"T be worse than Hamlin
ejthedj;3036176 said:The one major change that needs to be made at this point...
Watkins has looked good when playing, on st, and in preseason.
To paraphrase Kinky Friedman, he CAN"T be worse than Hamlin
ejthedj;3036176 said:The one major change that needs to be made at this point...
Watkins has looked good when playing, on st, and in preseason.
To paraphrase Kinky Friedman, he CAN"T be worse than Hamlin
Agreed, he got a bad rap for that Philly game but he really hasn't been all that terrible when he has started in spot duty imo.ejthedj;3036305 said:Watkins looked bad as a rook a couple of times and people never forget.
He even looked decent replacing Roy Willi last year until he got hurt, but people remember negative ish more.
Is anyone here really defending Hamlin as an adequate starter?
newnationcb;3036326 said:Am I missing something? Did Hamlin have a bad game? Gerald is a bonafide baller but I thought Hamlin played well today. And yes, I'll defend Hamlin over our alternatives.
SharutoX;3036530 said:Sensabaugh on the other hand.. Damn that dude is a beast
bbgun;3036535 said:See? It is possible to overreact after a win.
Bluefin;3036519 said:Ken Hamlin is paid like he's a difference maker and he basically doesn't show up.
Since signing a contract extension, Hamlin has 1 interception and 0 passes defensed in 22 games.
He had 5 picks and 15 passes defensed in '07 when looking for a big contract.
Hamlin is lucky we don't have any alternatives at present.
He will not return next season, IMO.
Bob Sacamano;3036539 said:what took you so long to post? depressed that we won?
CowboyFan74;3036291 said:I'd play Ball over deer in headlights Watkins....