Fredd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,995
- Reaction score
- 2,238
Gee maybe it wasn't luck it was the cowboys professional people know more than posters?
How DARE you spout the obvious!!!
Gee maybe it wasn't luck it was the cowboys professional people know more than posters?
Enough with Sharif Floyd please. He was passed over. So were dozens of other DL during Free Agency. The team obviously liked our DL and didn't expect the setback with Ratliff. He was being paid and counted on to start at DT this year. You can't have starter quality depth at every position with a salary cap and a 53 man roster.
How in the heck could the team not expect Ratliff to be injured? An injured Ratliff is a sure thing. If they didn't expect and plan for it, they are the biggest collection of retards in the league. Nobody can be that stupid.
Marinelli and Kiffin didn't want him.
If my intent was to be a smart***, it would have reflected that intent at a much higher level. Ratliff has been a walking injury for a couple of years and he had many nagging injuries over the last several years. If you hadn't recognized that, you must be on the Cowboys staff. It seems that they are the only ones surprised to the point that they didn't have a quality backup that will end up starting most of the games, while Ratliff continues to allow his attitude problem to grow. I honestly can't understand how anybody didn't expect this. The whole Cowboy organization was aware of his injuries and his lack of rehab. Surprise,surprise.this would be true if it weren't for the fact that between 2007 (when he became a full time starter) to 2011 he didn't miss a single game because of injury. 2012 was the first year he missed time because of injury. So If you're going to be a smart ***...at least be right
I don't think this is accurate. I think Kiffen and Marianelli thought that Ratliff would be fine (see below). But they and Jerry turned a blind eye to the fact that Ratliff cannot stay on the field, and overall has a bad attitude as shown by the fact that he did not rehab with the Cowboys' staff, but on his own. Now we are left with a free agent castoff (no offense to try-hard Hayden) when, had we stuck to our board, we would have a guy our own scouts rated Top 5 overall. I'm sorry, but say all you want about the run on OL and how good Fred has been (he has), but you set the talent level of you team back when you do not stick to your board.
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/a...eresting/e1fa422a-bdd7-4fa2-813a-20a26ddd6e1a
there is clearly nothing to substantiate your opinions. At the center position Fred is outplaying Floyd [at the DT] to date and that is clearly so.
Floyd has been hurt, he has not been outplayed. Floyd was rated #5 on our board; Fred was rated #22 (and by other teams much lower). That substantiates my opinion. I am as happy as the next guy that Fred is playing well for us, but all the scouts said that Floyd was the more talented player.
Or the DL coach.Do you think Kiffin places a premium on a defensive tackle who doesn't excel at rushing the passer?
Floyd has been hurt, he has not been outplayed. Floyd was rated #5 on our board; Fred was rated #22 (and by other teams much lower). That substantiates my opinion. I am as happy as the next guy that Fred is playing well for us, but all the scouts said that Floyd was the more talented player.
Just wondering, if we were never ever going to take Floyd, why was he even on our board? Teams take players off their boards all the time for scheme fit, character issues, etc. Yet, Floyd was still on our board, and Top 15 to boot...
The point is, you can't just say "Kiffin didn't like him" all the time when Kiffin's opinion on the current DL depth has been questionable to begin with. Maybe we should let coaches coach and scouts scout?
[
If my intent was to be a smart***, it would have reflected that intent at a much higher level. Ratliff has been a walking injury for a couple of years and he had many nagging injuries over the last several years. If you hadn't recognized that, you must be on the Cowboys staff. It seems that they are the only ones surprised to the point that they didn't have a quality backup that will end up starting most of the games, while Ratliff continues to allow his attitude problem to grow. I honestly can't understand how anybody didn't expect this. The whole Cowboy organization was aware of his injuries and his lack of rehab. Surprise,surprise.
I just love how people like exaggerate the facts to prove there little agenda. You can call out the staff all you want, but to sit here and say that we should have spent a first round pick on a 3-4 DT and hoped that we could make him fit our scheme because Ratliff "may" not play at the beginning of this year, and pass up fixing our OL and getting the center that we most desperately needed..then you're the more foolish than you claim the cowboys staff to be.
You can call me foolish, but you can blindly support Jerry and the perennial 8-8 franchise he has created. I have no agenda, other than to call out the owner when he goes off the grid and ignores the many months his scouts put into grading these college players. And now, when we find out that Ratliff's groin injury was much more serious and season-threatening than the team let out publicly, and that it dates back to before the draft, I think it is appropriate to question his decision even more. If, as you say, Floyd was nothing more than a 3-4 DT, why was he on the board to begin with? The team removes players who are not scheme fts all the time. But they kept Floyd on the board and they kept him at 5 overall.
Kiffin didn't say he wasn't a good player. He said he wasn't really a good fit for what he wants to do. He would be the expert on that. Instead, talk about whether we should have selected Richardson. That's who we wanted to take.
I didn't know I was quoting you but, since you butted in anyways..I'm not blindly supporting Jerry. I'm looking at the team and its needs. DT was not a first round need. OL was, we either needed a guard or a center in the first round. You don't need first round players all up and down a defensive line (remember we do have two already and a third round pick). SHould we have drafted a DT in the draft, yes, we didn't oh well, but we got a center that we badly needed. To sit here now and say because we should have known that Ratliff would still be injured so we should have passed up solidifying our OL in a Passing League, to take a DT we may or may not fit our scheme is just foolish. As for why they had them there he's a top 5 talent....whether or not he fit the scheme that Kiffin wanted to run was a different matter. Obviously based on the move, we felt it was better to go for the OL, then Hope, that he could fit.
As for why they had them there he's a top 5 talent....whether or not he fit the scheme that Kiffin wanted to run was a different matter. Obviously based on the move said:Sorry this argument does not fly
Our draft board does not include all draftable players , it reflects players we would pick at those picks which should account for scheme fit