Should Romo be Traded?

NyGiantz;3664264 said:
No offense, but I can be here so I am. Pretty simple eh?

Hell, whatever gets you off is fine by me.

It just seems kinda weird that a Giants fan is hanging out on a Cowboy's board just for the hell of it. I visit some Giants boards the week of our games, but I dont just hang out there just for the hell of it.


Like I said, feel free to stay as long as you want, just seems kinda weird to me, thats all.
 
Beast_from_East;3664268 said:
Hell, whatever gets you off is fine by me.

It just seems kinda weird that a Giants fan is hanging out on a Cowboy's board just for the hell of it. I visit some Giants boards the week of our games, but I dont just hang out there just for the hell of it.


Like I said, feel free to stay as long as you want, just seems kinda weird to me, thats all.

My bad I thought you were trying to be an *******. I like to keep tabs on my teams biggest enemies and engage in talk about our teams. Being we are such huge rivals I am really interested in your guys team almost as much as mine.
 
Gemini Dolly;3663246 said:
how bout trade Romo and Ware and get 2 first rounders next year?
Why would we do this? We'd be fortunate in the extreme to land one, let alone two, players as talented as Romo and Ware in the first round. This team has tons of problems, but I don't think Romo and Ware are part of them.
 
tupperware;3664015 said:
How is the built to win now model working for us so far this year? :)
It hasn't worked this year but my point is that trading Romo would be a major setback. Trading Romo means it won't work next year, or the year after that. As a player, Romo could be had for a first, sure. But his value to this offense, and franchise as a whole, is worth WAY more than that. Draft picks don't win games like Tony does, and the chances of using that pick on another quarterback whose as productive as Tony are slim to none.

clutch88;3663876 said:
If Phillip Rivers or Eli Manning were a cowboy for the last 3 years we would have WON a SUPERBOWL.
If either of them were this team's QB they wouldn't have been in the playoffs once in the last three years.
 
Trace1015;3663220 said:
Don't flame but really if you were offered a First rounder for Romo would you take it

NO the QB position isn't the problem with this team
 
Romo would be one of the best QBs in the league if he wasn't surrounded by such garbage...asically his entire career he's made the most out a terrible Oline and no running game. He's not the problem.

He's the only reason we're gonna get a good coach next year too
 
nice%20fail%20thread.jpg
 
Sometimes when I read some of the things people actually believe I find myself amazed that they actually figured out how to sign on to the internet.

I used to think people just like pushing peoples buttons when they posted garbage like this. But unfortunately now I realize that some of these people are that misguided.

Trading Romo would really show that Jerry has passed Al Davis in the crazy old man category.

He would be the laughing stock of the league. Luckily for all of us fans Jerry is smart enough to not trade our best player for a gamble of a draft pick who would actually get paid more money with a huge signing bonus and guaranteed money.

The reality is Jerry wouldnt be able to make such huge moves even if he was Al Davis crazy. Making all of these moves like cutting barber and paying a backup QB 70 million would push us way over the salary cap. So they really are not possible. Add signing a guy like Logan Mankins to the mix and its just not realistic.

We have problems. But getting rid of your best player who has more heart than anyone on this team isnt the answer. Romo actually tried to put himself back in the game with a broken collarbone. That is heart. Witten almost knocked out a trainer over keeping him out of the game when he got his bell rung. Thats heart.
 
bleedin' blue;3663960 said:
Anybody recall how many crappy QB's we have been through since Aikman?
YOU DON"T GET RID OF A QB LIKE ROMO!!!!!!
:bang2: :banghead: :bang2: :banghead: :bang2: :banghead: :bang2: :banghead: :bang2: :banghead:

C'mon...he's overrated.

Haven't you seen that ESPN list?
 
M'Kevon;3663377 said:
So, I guess Joe took my advice and passed the pipe to you.

First, Romo isn't going to be traded. As disappointed as Jones may be with this team, he still remembers the QB wasteland that was Dallas between Aikman and Romo. This is not a QB friendly draft; trade Romo and Dallas is useless for two years plus.

Secondly, what do you think Oakland and NE are going to want for either one of their picks, not just one. C'mon, this is real life, not Madden.

I know everyone looks at what NE has this year, and believes they could do the same. NE got to where they are in 2011 based upon moves for the last three years. While it's nice to dream and drool over such fantasies, it ain't happening.

Maybe not, if you heard later what Jerry Jones said, that whatever it takes, something along those lines, thefan105.3 aired it. This is a QB friendly draft, you havent done your homework, this draft is suppose to rival the 83 QB draft. There are about 4 elite possible QBs, 4.

As far as Oakland and New England, again, you havent dont your homework. New England has Oakland's first round draft choice, in the Richard Seymour trade. So, New England has 2 number one draft choices, and if New England can move up and get an impact QB or RB like the runner from Alabama, they will do that, but most likely they want a top QB like Luck because Tom Brady isnt going to play forever.

Same for Tony Romo, Romo isnt going to play forever, because again, how old is Romo? Romo will be 31 next year. Most top rated QBs are gone by time they reach 34, beat up etc... And Romo stated very firmly that when Jason Witten retires, Romo will retire.

I see possibly 3 more years for Witten, Witten has gotten beaten up last few years, and just starting to get concussions.

3-4 more years at tops for Witten.

Thats why I want to see Stephen McGee in December, to see if he can play and is learning and growing, if not, then you know you need to draft a top rated QB in draft.

So, pay attention, know your stuff.
 
superonyx;3664432 said:
Sometimes when I read some of the things people actually believe I find myself amazed that they actually figured out how to sign on to the internet.

I used to think people just like pushing peoples buttons when they posted garbage like this. But unfortunately now I realize that some of these people are that misguided.

Trading Romo would really show that Jerry has passed Al Davis in the crazy old man category.

He would be the laughing stock of the league. Luckily for all of us fans Jerry is smart enough to not trade our best player for a gamble of a draft pick who would actually get paid more money with a huge signing bonus and guaranteed money.

The reality is Jerry wouldnt be able to make such huge moves even if he was Al Davis crazy. Making all of these moves like cutting barber and paying a backup QB 70 million would push us way over the salary cap. So they really are not possible. Add signing a guy like Logan Mankins to the mix and its just not realistic.

We have problems. But getting rid of your best player who has more heart than anyone on this team isnt the answer. Romo actually tried to put himself back in the game with a broken collarbone. That is heart. Witten almost knocked out a trainer over keeping him out of the game when he got his bell rung. Thats heart.

Not if you can get 2 number one draft picks and a 3rd rounder. I would consider that in a heart beat, especially if the trade is to someone like Cleveland, or some team that picks in the top of the NFL draft next year, 1st overall to about the 10th spot. Note, I said consider, you should always look at your options and how to keep refreshing your team with top talent like the patriots do. The Cowboys did that in the mid 70s with Ed Jones, Randy White and Tony Dorsett. I am not saying doing it, I am saying consider it, think about it, get with your scouting department and see where what players will go where, and if you can get to the ones u want. If you cant, dont do it,but if you think you can, consider it,but the trade has to be sweet like it was with the Hershel Walker trade.

I would do that in a hearbeat. Why, the Steelers had basically everything set in stone with their team, experienced offensive line(sure we need to make some moves on offensive line, but if we can go out and get Mankins OG from New England-he is a free agent next year), and draft a top OT in draft in 1st round or 2nd, then your back in contention. Also remember the steelers drafted Big Ben with the 11th overall pick, best i remember, and rest was history, with big ben taking the steelers to 2 superbowls.

College: Miami University (Ohio)
NFL Draft: 2004 / Round: 1 / Pick: 11
Debuted in 2004 for the Pittsburgh Steelers



Career history
Pittsburgh Steelers (2004-present)

Roster status: Active
Career highlights and awards
AP NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year (2004)
Diet Pepsi NFL Rookie of the Year (2004)
2× Super Bowl champion (XL, XLIII)



Now follow here,
Cowboys have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7
If you can get 2 number ones, a 1st rounder this year, and a 3rd from a team in top 10 of the draft next year, plus a number 1 in 2012

You would have a 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7

If the Cowboys number one pick is first overall you could trade that down if you dont want Luck, possibly trade with new england, or some other team in top 5 of draft in first round, get an extra 2nd or 3rd, so going with down 4 spots or so, get an extra 2nd or 3rd, then you have

1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2 or 3 for moving down four spots or so, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7

Do you know how many top picks that is in top 100?
7, Seven top picks in 100.

And if you trade down with New England if Oaklands pick is in top 10 to 12 of the draft, (remember we got Ware with 11th overall pick in 1st round), you would have

1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7th

Thats 8 picks in top 100. Now, you can trade back up using that extra 3rd if you make trade with new england, and take CB Peterson.

You still have ammunition to get a top
CB Peterson, top OL, top QB, and if that is to much for jerry jones to spend on number one draft picks, you can trade that 4th number one down, for a future number one, and get a 2nd and 4th this year.

Still ammunition to trade up if you need to, get good players in 2nd to 5th rounds. LIke getting a DE/LB or whatever, top safety, RB,

Thats how you rebuild and you would still if you trade that 4th number one, 3 numbers ones in 2012, more than enough ammunition to get some more impact top rated players that can change face of this team

While at same time, trading for some future probowler like another charles Haley type player that played on superbowl teams and shows this team what it takes to be a winner and championship team.

You could rock and roll then for about 7 years in dominance!
 
cowboyjoe;3664657 said:
Maybe not, if you heard later what Jerry Jones said, that whatever it takes, something along those lines, thefan105.3 aired it. This is a QB friendly draft, you havent done your homework, this draft is suppose to rival the 83 QB draft. There are about 4 elite possible QBs, 4.

4 elite QBs? Besides Luck and Locker (and I'd put an "*" besides Locker), who is considered elite in this draft? Just because they're your pet cats, doesn't make them elite.
As far as Oakland and New England, again, you havent dont your homework. New England has Oakland's first round draft choice, in the Richard Seymour trade. So, New England has 2 number one draft choices, and if New England can move up and get an impact QB or RB like the runner from Alabama, they will do that, but most likely they want a top QB like Luck because Tom Brady isnt going to play forever.

No, you haven't done your homework. NE got a first round pick from the only NFL team that would make that trade, Oakland. Look at NE's draft moves the last three years. They take advantage of the Oaklands of the NFL, and rarely give up anything of value in return. NE isn't gonna give up the farm for Luck, and recent NFL draft history shows the folly of 1st round RBs. So why do you think NE is suddenly going to go brain dead now?

Also, in your original post, you mentioned getting Oakland's 1st rounder. Refresh my memory - doesn't NE have that pick? So we are going to trade with NE for BOTH their first rounders? Really?

Same for Tony Romo, Romo isnt going to play forever, because again, how old is Romo? Romo will be 31 next year. Most top rated QBs are gone by time they reach 34, beat up etc... And Romo stated very firmly that when Jason Witten retires, Romo will retire.

Doubtful, for reasons previously explained to you by others.

I see possibly 3 more years for Witten, Witten has gotten beaten up last few years, and just starting to get concussions.

3-4 more years at tops for Witten.

Thats why I want to see Stephen McGee in December, to see if he can play and is learning and growing, if not, then you know you need to draft a top rated QB in draft.

So, pay attention, know your stuff.

Back atcha. This ain't Madden.
 
ROMO is the best player we have!


I'll give you WARE, NEWMAN and Witten put together before you touch ROMO.
 
Romo is the franchise. I have no doubt that surrounded by quality coaching with effective schemes that demand the most of their players...coupled with a really good O-line...you'll get a SB in Dallas.

Romo is the bright spot to this otherwise extremely disappointing franchise. (dez #2)

Doc
 
You guys are scaring me.

Are we in that bad of shape right now that we have to trade away a "pretty good" QB in Romo for some draft picks and draft a Mallett or a Luck and hope in a few years that would have done the trick for a Superbowl?
 
casmith07;3664032 said:
I'll bet you $20 they won't stop when we win.

Ill take your bet (20 american dollars are like 100 pesos to me so its even better to me jeje)

Now we only have to wait till wade take us to the big game and win it....
 
dbair1967;3663288 said:
I cant type the words I thought of when reading it.

I guess we should get ready though, there will mindless ignorance like this for the next several months. And its just further proof of how dumb this fan base is.


the dumbest around
 
DallasDomination;3666285 said:
ROMO is the best player we have!


I'll give you WARE, NEWMAN and Witten put together before you touch ROMO.

Mmm... I would take Ware before Romo... but theyre the best we have in D and O.
 
Back
Top