hornitosmonster
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,053
- Reaction score
- 5,369
We have bigger holes to fill. A QB shouldn't even be on the board. All you internet GM's make me 


Right Romo's not one of the best QBs in the league. That's why he's the 4th highest rated QB in NFL history, is 3 seasons away from almost every franchise record, has 3 probowls in 5 years, averages 4k yards and 27TDs, etc. Only an idiot would think he's NOT one of the best in the league because he is.The Quest for Six;3759742 said:Quaterbacks don't grow on trees, especially franchise ones and franchise quarterbacks take three years on average to comprehend and understand the schemes thrown at them in todays game, at which Romo would be 34-35 years of age. And only an idiot would argue that Romo is one of the best quaurerbacks in the league, he is NOT!!!! he has shown poor mechanics, poor decisions and sulking on the bench isn't a leader in my books
The Quest for Six;3759742 said:Quaterbacks don't grow on trees, especially franchise ones and franchise quarterbacks take three years on average to comprehend and understand the schemes thrown at them in todays game, at which Romo would be 34-35 years of age. And only an idiot would argue that Romo is one of the best quaurerbacks in the league, he is NOT!!!! he has shown poor mechanics, poor decisions and sulking on the bench isn't a leader in my books
McCordsville Cowboy;3759760 said::wink2: :fact:
hornitosmonster;3759775 said:I pray to god that Romo goes to a team that will appreciate him, in fact I hope he wins at least two superbowls when he leaves. Just to spite these stupid idiots on this board.
The Quest for Six;3759742 said:What you fail to comprehend is that your thinking is the same thinking Jerry used when Troy Aikman was 31, don't worry about the future, just worry about today, nevermind that Troy retired a year later and Dallas spend six years and numerous quartrbacks trying to find that franchise quarterback because they never planned for Aikmans replacement..and only found one by sheer luck, because a second round pick was too busy smokin pot all the time and was cut, or Romo wouldn't of made the roster that year....
Quaterbacks don't grow on trees, especially franchise ones and franchise quarterbacks take three years on average to comprehend and understand the schemes thrown at them in todays game, at which Romo would be 34-35 years of age. And only an idiot would argue that Romo is one of the best quaurerbacks in the league, he is NOT!!!! he has shown poor mechanics, poor decisions and sulking on the bench isn't a leader in my books
SDCowboy85;3759778 said:I agree 100%. I'm starting hope Romo not only drops this team like a hot potato when his contract ends but wins multiple superbowls. He deserves it and almost any other team he goes to is going to appreciate him for being one of the top QBs. Not want him gone because the team sucks. We can then drop our 1st round pick on whatever the hot QB prospect is at the time that will likely not amount to half the QB Romo and people can want him gone too and we can repeat the process forever. Good times.
sonnyboy;3759784 said:Why would you want Romo to leave?
What have the Cowboys done to make you think they don't appreciate him?
One hole of an *** fan on crack claims he sucks and you now think he's not appreciated.
SDCowboy85;3759785 said:I don't want him gone in terms of what he does for this team. I'm just getting sick of the crap in both the media and the vocal minority of fans. It's never ending. I also think he deserves a superbowl and I don't think he's going to get one here as this organization doesn't seem to want to focus on improving the current team or doing anything to keep him off the turf.
SDCowboy85;3759732 said:Exactly. The franchise QB position is one you DO NOT put pressure on. Especially on the QB that's consistently been one of the best in the league. It's amazing how Romo's out for a half season and some fans forget everything.
rcaldw;3759263 said:You know, I don't buy this anymore. People also argued that the Cowboys couldn't win without Romo. If we win at Arizona we will be 4-2 without him.
Now, I haven't forgotten 1991 and the stupid arguments against Aikman based on the little Beurlein run. The schedule hit just right in 1991, they scaled back the game plan and played more defense oriented, and Beurlein just drove a bus.
So, I'm not arguing that Romo is not our guy. He is. But he is also going to be 31 next season. I think it is time to get a franchise QB, IF HE IS THERE to be taken. I certainly wouldn't force anything, but if the draft were to fall where a legitimate guy is there for us, I wouldn't pass on him.
If Jake Locker is there for us, I'd take him. (Because Luck won't be)
Little Jr;3759813 said:Someone might have pointed this out already but we are 4-4 without Romo now. We will be 5-4 if we beat the cards without Romo. I think people forget about the Jac andGB games. Lol. I know I try to. Lol. JG record is 4-2 not the Cowboys without Romo.
SDCowboy85;3759732 said:Exactly. The franchise QB position is one you DO NOT put pressure on. Especially on the QB that's consistently been one of the best in the league. It's amazing how Romo's out for a half season and some fans forget everything.
